Maxwellian Scientific Revolution: a case study in Kantian epistemology
Logos and Episteme 5 (2):183-207 (2014)
Abstract
It is exhibited that maxwellian electrodynamics grew out of the old pre-maxwellian programmes reconciliation: the electrodynamics of Ampere-Weber, the wave theory of Young-Fresnel and Faraday’s scientific research programme. The programmes’ meeting led to construction of the whole hierarchy of theoretical objects starting from the genuine crossbreeds (the displacement current) and up to usual mongrels. After the displacement current invention the interpenetration of the pre-maxwellian programmes began that marked the beginning of theoretical schemes of optics and electromagnetism real unification. Maxwell’s programme did supersede its rivals because it had assimilated some ideas of the Ampere-Weber programme, as well as the presuppositions of the programmes of Young-Fresnel and Faraday. Maxwellian programme’s victory over its rivals became possible because the core of Maxwell’s unification strategy was formed by Kantian epistemology looked through the prism of William Whewell and such representatives of Scottish Enlightenment as Thomas Reid and William Hamilton. It was Kantian epistemology that enabled Hermann von Helmholtz and Heinrich Hertz to arrive at such a version of Maxwell’s theory that could serve a heuristical basis for the radio waves discovery.Author's Profile
ISBN(s)
2069-0533
DOI
10.5840/logos-episteme20145215
My notes
Similar books and articles
Reconsidering the Fresnel–Maxwell theory shift: how the realist can have her cake and EAT it too.Juha Saatsi - 2005 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 36 (3):509-538.
Einstein's revolution: A case study in communicative rationality. [REVIEW]Rinat M. Nugayev - 1999 - Foundations of Science 4 (2):155-204.
On the Material Invariant Formulation of Maxwell’s Displacement Current.Christo I. Christov - 2006 - Foundations of Physics 36 (11):1701-1717.
Why did the new physics force out the old?Rinat M. Nugayev - 1996 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 10 (2):127 – 140.
Bogdanov and Lenin: Epistemology and revolution.David G. Rowley - 1996 - Studies in East European Thought 48 (1):1 - 19.
The enlightenment, Popper and Einstein.Nicholas Maxwell - 2005 - In Yong Shi, David L. Olson & Antonie Stam (eds.), Knowledge and Wisdom: Advances in Multiple Criteria Decision Making and Human Systems Management,. IOS Press.
Thomas Kuhn and the chemical revolution.Paul Hoyningen-Huene - 2008 - Foundations of Chemistry 10 (2):101-115.
Scientific understanding after the Ingold revolution in organic chemistry.William Goodwin - 2007 - Philosophy of Science 74 (3):386-408.
“Do We Need a Scientific Revolution.Nicholas Maxwell - 2008 - Journal for Biological Physics and Chemistry 8 (3):95-105.
Nonrelativistic para-Maxwellian electrodynamics with preferred reference frame in the universe.Jose G. Vargas - 1982 - Foundations of Physics 12 (9):889-905.
On Scientific Representations: From Kant to a New Philosophy of Science.Giovanni Boniolo - 2007 - Palgrave-Macmillan.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-10-04
Downloads
618 (#15,304)
6 months
56 (#23,051)
2014-10-04
Downloads
618 (#15,304)
6 months
56 (#23,051)
Historical graph of downloads