Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 12 (3):257-264 (2009)

Authors
Abstract
The increasing costs of healthcare delivery led to different political and administrative approaches trying to preserve the core values of the welfare state. This approach has well documented weaknesses namely with regard to healthcare rationing. The objective of this paper is to evaluate if independent healthcare regulation is an important tool with regard to the construction of fair processes for setting limits to healthcare. Methodologically the authors depart from Norman Daniels’ and James Sabin’s theory of accountability for reasonableness and try to determine if new regulatory models—namely independent agencies—perform better with regard to the public disclosure of the reasons and rationales of healthcare rationing. In publicly financed healthcare systems independent regulation is an important tool to assure fair and reasonable procedures of prioritising services. In accordance with the principle of public accountability, independent regulatory agencies are particularly well suited to assure publicity of the decision-making processes, relevance of the rationale involved and particularly mechanisms for challenge and dispute resolution regarding limit setting decisions. It follows that independent healthcare regulation could be regarded not only as an instrument for performance improvement but also as a tool of social justice. The authors conclude by stating that accountability for reasonableness should be regarded as a landmark of any healthcare reform. And therefore regulators have the social task of assuring that the rationales for limit-setting decisions are clearly accessible to the public
Keywords Accountability  Healthcare regulation  Independent regulatory agencies
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11019-008-9177-4
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,107
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Benchmarks of Fairness for Health Care Reform.Norman Daniels, Donald W. Light & Ronald L. Caplan - 1998 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 41 (4):605.
Rescuing Universal Health Care.Norman Daniels - 2007 - Hastings Center Report 37 (2):3-3.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Justice, Health, and Healthcare.Norman Daniels - 2001 - American Journal of Bioethics 1 (2):2 – 16.
Evidence-Based Medicine: A New Tool for Resource Allocation?Rui Nunes - 2003 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 6 (3):297-301.
Professional Accountability.Modupe Olusola Oyetunde & Victoria Bolanle Brown - 2012 - Jona’s Healthcare Law, Ethics, and Regulation 14 (4):109-114.
A Century of Healthcare Delivery Celebrating Achievements.Dominick L. Flarey - 1999 - Jona's Healthcare Law, Ethics, and Regulation 1 (4):3.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-12-01

Total views
48 ( #224,315 of 2,454,617 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #303,471 of 2,454,617 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes