European Journal of Philosophy 29 (4):988-1009 (2021)

Authors
Tyke Nunez
University of South Carolina
Abstract
According to what was the standard view (Poincaré; Wang, etc.), although Frege endorses, and Kant denies, the claim that arithmetic is reducible to logic, there is not a substantive disagreement between them because their conceptions of logic are too different. In his “Frege, Kant, and the logic in logicism,” John MacFarlane aims to establish that Frege and Kant do share enough of a conception of logic for this to be a substantive, adjudicable dispute. MacFarlane maintains that for both Frege and Kant, the fundamental defining characteristic of logic is “that it provides norms for thought as such (MacFarlane, 2002, p.57). I defend the standard view. I show that MacFarlane's argument rests on conflating the way that pure general logic is normative as a canon and as a propaedeutic, and that once these are distinguished the argument is blocked.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/ejop.12620
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Functional Analysis.Robert Cummins - 1975 - Journal of Philosophy 72 (November):741-64.
In Defense of Proper Functions.Ruth Garrett Millikan - 1989 - Philosophy of Science 56 (June):288-302.
Frege, Kant, and the Logic in Logicism.John MacFarlane - 2002 - Philosophical Review 111 (1):25-65.
Words and Life.Hilary Putnam & James Conant - 1994 - Philosophy 70 (273):460-463.

View all 30 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Frege, Kant, and the Logic in Logicism.John MacFarlane - 2002 - Philosophical Review 111 (1):25-65.
Kant and Frege on Existence.Toni Kannisto - 2018 - Synthese (8):01-26.
Frege, the Normativity of Logic, and the Kantian Tradition.Anssi Korhonen - 2018 - In Gisela Bengtsson, Simo Säätelä & Alois Pichler (eds.), New Essays on Frege: Between Science and Literature. Springer. pp. 47-74.
Formality of Logic and Frege’s Begriffsschrift.Daniele Mezzadri - 2019 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 49 (2):182-207.
Kant and Frege on Existence and the Ontological Argument.Michael E. Cuffaro - 2012 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 29 (4):337-354.
Putting Frege in Perspective.Joan Carol Weiner - 1982 - Dissertation, Harvard University
Frege, Logic, and Logicism.John-Michael Kuczynski - 2016 - Amazon Digital Services LLC.
Kant, Wittgenstein and the Limits of Logic.Mary Tiles - 1980 - History and Philosophy of Logic 1 (1-2):151-170.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-10-30

Total views
211 ( #54,298 of 2,506,852 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
62 ( #13,291 of 2,506,852 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes