Authors
Abstract
This paper compares Kant’s and Leibniz’s views on the relation between knowing subjects and known objects. Kant discusses Leibniz’s philosophy in the ‘Amphiboly’ section of the first Critique. According to Kant, Leibniz’s main error is mistaking objects in space and time for mind-independent things in themselves, that is, for monads. The paper argues that, pace Kant, Leibniz regards objects in space and time as mind-dependent. A deeper divergence between the two philosophers concerns knowing subjects. For Leibniz, they are substances. For Kant, we cannot know whether they are substances. Kant conceives of knowing subjects as complex systems of cognitive capacities.
Keywords Kant  Leibniz  Amphiboly
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1080/09608780802548390
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Upload history
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Leibniz and the Elements of Compound Bodies.Pauline Phemister - 2014 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 22 (1):57-78.
Leibniz: Physics and Philosophy.Daniel Garber - 1995 - In Nicholas Jolley (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Leibniz. Cambridge University Press. pp. 270--352.
Leibniz's Phenomenalisms.Glenn A. Hartz - 1992 - Philosophical Review 101 (3):511-549.

View all 16 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-02-01

Total views
239 ( #32,286 of 2,330,034 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
42 ( #14,042 of 2,330,034 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes