Social Philosophy and Policy 13 (1):27-58 (1996)

Authors
Martha Nussbaum
University of Chicago
Abstract
Philoctetes was a good man and a good soldier. When he was on his way to Troy to fight alongside the Greeks, he had a terrible misfortune. By sheer accident he trespassed in a sacred precinct on the island of Lemnos. As punishment he was bitten on the foot by the serpent who guarded the shrine. His foot began to ooze with foul-smelling pus, and the pain made him cry out curses that spoiled the other soldiers' religious observances. They therefore left him alone on the island, a lame man with no resources but his bow and arrows, no friends but the animals who were also his food. Ten years later, according to Sophocles' version of the story, they come to bring him back: for they have learned that they cannot win the war without him. The leaders of the expedition think of Philoctetes as a tool of their purposes; they plan to trick him into returning, with no empathy for his plight. The Chorus of soldiers, however, has a different response. Even before they see the man, they imagine vividly what it is like to be him– and they enter a protest against the callousness of the commanders: For my part, I pity him– thinking of how, with no living soul to care for him, seeing no friendly face, wretched, always alone, he suffers with a fierce affliction, and has no resources to meet his daily needs. How in the world does the poor man survive?
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0265052500001515
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,599
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Vices of Argument.Andrew Aberdein - 2016 - Topoi 35 (2):413-422.
The Vulnerable and the Susceptible.Michael H. Kottow - 2003 - Bioethics 17 (5-6):460-471.
Compassion and Pity: An Evaluation of Nussbaum’s Analysis and Defense.M. Weber - 2005 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 7 (5):487-511.

View all 30 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Compassion: The Basic Social Emotion.Martha Nussbaum - 1996 - Social Philosophy and Policy 13 (1):27.
A Buddhist Critique of Nussbaum’s Account of Compassion.Jeremiah Conway - 2001 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 8 (1):7-12.
Pity and Compassion as Social Virtues.Brian Carr - 1999 - Philosophy 74 (3):411-429.
Compassion and Pity: An Evaluation of Nussbaum’s Analysis and Defense.M. Weber - 2005 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 7 (5):487-511.
Compassion: An Aristotelian Approach.Trudy C. Conway - 2001 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 8 (1):1-6.
Compassion: An Aristotelian Approach.Trudy C. Conway - 2001 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 8 (1):1-6.
Compassion and Beyond.Roger Crisp - 2008 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 11 (3):233-246.
Upheavals of Thought.Martha Nussbaum - 2001 - Journal of Religious Ethics 31 (2):325-341.
Conceiving Emotions: Martha Nussbaum's Upheavals of Thought.Diana Fritz Cates - 2003 - Journal of Religious Ethics 31 (2):325-341.
Toward a Theory of the Basic Minimum.Dale Dorsey - 2008 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 7 (4):423-445.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-02-17

Total views
119 ( #92,912 of 2,462,228 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
21 ( #38,315 of 2,462,228 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes