Journal of Moral Philosophy 3 (2):159-178 (2006)
All modern liberal democracies have strong reasons to support an idea of toleration, understood as involving respect, not only grudging acceptance, and to extend it to all religious and secular doctrines, limiting only conduct that violates the rights of other citizens. There is no modern democracy, however, in which toleration of this sort is a stable achievement. Why is toleration, attractive in principle, so difficult to achieve? The normative case for toleration was well articulated by John Locke in his influential A Letter Concerning Toleration , although his attractive proposal thus rests on a fragile foundation. Kant did much more, combining a Lockean account of the state with a profound diagnosis of radical evil, the tendencies in all human beings to militate against stable toleration and respect. But Kant proposed no mechanism through which the state might mitigate the harmful influence of radical evil, thus rendering toleration stable. One solution to this problem was proposed by Rousseau, but it has deep problems. How, then, can a respectful pluralistic society shore up the fragile human basis of toleration, especially in a world in which we need to cultivate toleration not only within each state, but also among peoples and states, in this interlocking world? Key Words: toleration emotion evil liberal democracy Locke Mill Kant Rousseau.
|Keywords||emotion Locke Mill evil Rousseau liberal democracy toleration Kant|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Can Liberal Perfectionism Justify Religious Toleration? Wall on Promoting and Respecting.Kevin Vallier - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 162 (3):645-664.
No Abiding City: Hume, Naturalism, and Toleration.Samuel Clark - 2009 - Philosophy 84 (1):75-94.
Locke's Case for Religious Toleration: Its Neglected Foundation in the Essay Concerning Human Understanding.J. Judd Owen - manuscript
Legal Toleration for Belief and Behaviour.Kyle Swan - 2010 - History of Political Thought 31 (1):87-106.
Toleration and Reciprocity: Commentary on Martha Nussbaum and Henry Shue.Michael Blake - 2002 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 1 (3):325-335.
Tolerating Nonliberal States: Human Rights as a Grounding Principle?Cristian Lupu - 2007 - Journal of Global Ethics 3 (2):223 – 235.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads134 ( #35,789 of 2,172,044 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #46,377 of 2,172,044 )
How can I increase my downloads?