Interpretation and understanding in hermeneutics and deconstruction

Philosophy of the Social Sciences 24 (4):426-438 (1994)
It seems that Derrida objects to Gadamer's hermeneutics on the grounds that it is, as Gadamer puts it, "a discipline that guarantees truth," taking it as something that partakes in the "metaphysics of presence." However, this criticism is based on a misunderstanding of the nature of hermeneutic truth. It would be on target if hermeneutic truth were some kind of universal condition of correspondence. Gadamer has tried to correct this conception of hermeneutic truth in his various attempts at opening a dialogue with deconstructionism. In this article, the author argues that in a possible debate between hermeneutics and deconstructionism, there are good reasons to judge in favor of the former.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1177/004839319402400402
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,798
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index

Total downloads
37 ( #144,384 of 2,202,423 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #300,203 of 2,202,423 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature