Moral obligation and moral motivation in confucian role-based ethics

Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 8 (1):1-11 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

How is the Confucian moral agent motivated to do what he or she judges to be right or good? In western philosophy, the answer to a question such as this depends on whether one is an internalist or externalist concerning moral motivation. In this article, I will first interpret Confucian ethics as role-based ethics and then argue that we can attribute to Confucianism a position on moral motivation that is neither internalist nor externalist but somewhere in between. I will then illustrate my claim with my reading of Mencius 6A4, showing that it is superior to readings found in the literature, which typically assume that Mencius is an internalist.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 106,716

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Moral Judgment and Motivation.Xiao Zhang - 2020 - Dissertation, University of Birmingham
Confucius and mencius on the motivation to be moral.Yong Huang - 2010 - Philosophy East and West 60 (1):pp. 65-87.
An Internalist Dilemma—and an Externalist Solution.Caj Strandberg - 2012 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 10 (1):25-51.
Dispositions and fetishes: Externalist models of moral motivation.James Dreier - 2000 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 61 (3):619-638.
Moral motivation pluralism.Ragnar Francén - 2010 - The Journal of Ethics 14 (2):117-148.
Moral Judgment and Motivation.Chris David Meyers - 2002 - Dissertation, Loyola University of Chicago
A Step towards Human Rights in Confucianism.Larry Lai - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 9:23-29.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
155 (#156,182)

6 months
6 (#738,277)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

A source book in Chinese philosophy.Wing-Tsit Chan - 1963 - Princeton, N.J.,: Princeton University Press. Edited by Wing-Tsit Chan.
A treatise of human nature.David Hume - 2007 - In Elizabeth Schmidt Radcliffe, Richard McCarty, Fritz Allhoff & Anand Vaidya, Late modern philosophy: essential readings with commentary. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
How to derive "ought" from "is".John R. Searle - 1964 - Philosophical Review 73 (1):43-58.

View all 14 references / Add more references