American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 79 (2):327-344 (2005)
The aim of this paper is to explore the perplexity of the notion of sincerity, chiefly by examining Lionel Thrilling’s account in his Sincerity and Authenticity. I will show that his account is problematic if interpreted as a “truthfulness account.” However, I will also show that his basic insight can be preserved in my own account of sincerity as a kind of congruence between the agent’s avowal and those beliefs, feelings, and dispositions that constitute the agent’s “true self.” The latter include a set of minimally morally acceptable beliefs, feelings, and dispositions that constitute the agent’s moral integrity. Further, the context of sincerity is one in which the agent realizes that his or her integrity, particularly the moral part, is vulnerable
|Keywords||Catholic Tradition Contemporary Philosophy History of Philosophy Philosophy and Religion|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Problems of Sincerity.Richard Moran - 2005 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 105 (3):341–361.
Refuting Polonius: Sincerity, Authenticity, and 'Shtick'.Lauren Bialystok - 2011 - Philosophical Papers 40 (2):207 - 231.
Straight Talk: Conceptions of Sincerity in Speech.John Eriksson - 2011 - Philosophical Studies 153 (2):213-234.
Moral Self-Striving and Sincerity (Redlichkeit).Susan M. Purviance - 2008 - Idealistic Studies 38 (3):185-192.
Beyond Proceduralism: A Chinese Perspective on Cheng (Sincerity) as a Political Virtue.Julia Tao - 2005 - Philosophy East and West 55 (1):64-79.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads9 ( #464,046 of 2,172,662 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #325,028 of 2,172,662 )
How can I increase my downloads?