Pragmatics and Society 5 (2):165-190 (2014)

This paper examines how a standardized question is launched and received in a corpus of performance appraisal interviews, with a focus on how pre-­formulated questions are translated into interaction. Using conversation analysis, we demonstrate that the same question becomes many different actions in practice. Prefaces as well as prosodic and lexical alterations make relevant different responses, and as such, the question can be recruited to initiate diverse interactional projects such as assessments and other socially delicate activities. As a consequence, goals of uniformity and standardization may be subverted. The interactional adaptations further evidence the strength of recipient design as reformulations also result in more fitted and personalized answers. Our study contributes to the understanding of standardization versus interactionalization, and points to the strong interrelationship between question design and the fitting of response options
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1075/ps.5.2.01nyr
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,417
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Footing.Erving Goffman - 1979 - Semiotica 25 (1-2):1-30.
Forms of Talk.Erving Goffman - 1981 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 17 (3):181-182.

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Ethical Dilemmas in Performance Appraisal Revisited.Clinton Longenecker & Dean Ludwig - 1990 - Journal of Business Ethics 9 (12):961 - 969.
What Constitutes a Formal Analogy?Kenneth Olson & Gilbert Plumer - 2002 - In Hans V. Hansen, Christopher W. Tindale, J. Anthony Blair, Ralph H. Johnson & Robert C. Pinto (eds.), Argumentation and its Applications [CD-ROM]. Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation. pp. 1-8.
The Question of Method in Ethics Consultation.George J. Agich - 2001 - American Journal of Bioethics 1 (4):31 – 41.
Evidence-Based Medicine and Progress in the Medical Sciences.Leen De Vreese - 2011 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 17 (5):852-856.


Added to PP index

Total views
7 ( #1,038,232 of 2,449,116 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #442,577 of 2,449,116 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes