Polish Journal of Philosophy 1 (2):99-117 (2007)
In this paper I argue that Isaiah Berlin’s theory of freedom should not be interpreted in a reductive sense. The distinction between negative and positive freedom, as different concepts and possibly conflicting values, truly holds (thereby excluding reductive interpretations that claim there is only one concept of freedom). Moreover, Berlin’s theory as a whole leaves room for both a comprehensive liberalism which advocates autonomy, critical reflection and personal judgement, as well as a liberalism of fear which defends a minimal level of decency and modesty aims at a modus vivendi. I think Berlin’s liberalism is one of hope and fear
|Keywords||Analytic Philosophy Contemporary Philosophy Continental Philosophy|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Hope: The Power of Wish and Possibility.Maria Miceli & Cristiano Castelfranchi - 2010 - Theory and Psychology 20 (2):251-276.
The Presidential Address: "From Hope and Fear Set Free".Isaiah Berlin - 1963 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 64 (1):1 - 30.
Isaiah Berlin: The History of Ideas as Psychodrama.Alan Ryan - 2013 - European Journal of Political Theory 12 (1):61-73.
The semiotics of culture and the phenomenology of fear.Mihhail Lotman - 2001 - Sign Systems Studies 29 (2):417-439.
A Strange Alliance: Isaiah Berlin and the Liberalism of the Fringes.Yael Tamir - 1998 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 1 (2):279-289.
Freedom After the Critique of Foundations: Marx, Liberalism, Castoriadis, and Agonistic Autonomy.Alexandros Kioupkiolis - 2012 - Palgrave-Macmillan.
Berlin's Two Concepts of Positive Liberty.Janos Kis - 2013 - European Journal of Political Theory 12 (1):31-48.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads14 ( #332,780 of 2,168,628 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #346,836 of 2,168,628 )
How can I increase my downloads?