Contrast classes and matching bias as explanations of the effects of negation on conditional reasoning
Thinking and Reasoning 8 (2):135 – 151 (2002)
In this paper the arguments for optimal data selection and the contrast class account of negations in the selection task and the conditional inference task are summarised, and contrasted with the matching bias approach. It is argued that the probabilistic contrast class account provides a unified, rational explanation for effects across these tasks. Moreover, there are results that are only explained by the contrast class account that are also discussed. The only major anomaly is the explicit negations effect in the selection task (Evans, Clibbens, & Rood, 1996), which it is argued may not be the result of normal interpretative processes. It is concluded that the effects of negation on human reasoning provide good evidence for the view that human reasoning processes may be rational according to a probabilistic standard.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Deontic Reasoning With Emotional Content: Evolutionary Psychology or Decision Theory?Nick Perham & Mike Oaksford - 2005 - Cognitive Science 29 (5):681-718.
Similar books and articles
How Reaction Time Measures Elucidate the Matching Bias and the Way Negations Are Processed.Jérôme Prado & Ira A. Noveck - 2006 - Thinking and Reasoning 12 (3):309 – 328.
Probabilistic Effects in Data Selection.Mike Oaksford, Nick Chater & Becki Grainger - 1999 - Thinking and Reasoning 5 (3):193 – 243.
Conditional Reasoning with Negations: Implicit and Explicit Affirmation or Denial and the Role of Contrast Classes.Walter Schroyens, Niki Verschueren, Walter Schaeken & Gery D'Ydewalle - 2000 - Thinking and Reasoning 6 (3):221 – 251.
The Processing of Negations in Conditional Reasoning: A Meta-Analytic Case Study in Mental Model and/or Mental Logic Theory.Walter J. Schroyens, Walter Schaeken & G. - 2001 - Thinking and Reasoning 7 (2):121 – 172.
Deductive Reasoning and Matching-Bias Inhibition Training: Evidence From a Debiasing Paradigm.Sylvain Moutier, Nathalie Angeard & Olivier Houde - 2002 - Thinking and Reasoning 8 (3):205 – 224.
Matching Bias and Set Sizes: A Discussion of Yama (2001).Jonathan St B. T. Evans - 2002 - Thinking and Reasoning 8 (2):153 – 163.
Matching Bias in Conditional Reasoning: Do We Understand It After 25 Years?Jonathan St B. T. Evans - 1998 - Thinking and Reasoning 4 (1):45 – 110.
Matching Versus Optimal Data Selection in the Wason Selection Task.Hiroshi Yama - 2001 - Thinking and Reasoning 7 (3):295 – 311.
Matching Bias in the Selection Task is Not Eliminated by Explicit Negations.Edgar Erdfelder, Karl Christoph Klauer & Christoph Stahl - 2008 - Thinking and Reasoning 14 (3):281-303.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads23 ( #217,445 of 2,163,679 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #348,043 of 2,163,679 )
How can I increase my downloads?