Discussion task demands and revising probabilities in the selection task: A comment on green, over, and Pyne
Thinking and Reasoning 4 (2):179 – 186 (1998)
Green, Over, and Pyne's (1997) paper (hereafter referred to as ''GOP") seems to provide a novel approach to examining probabilistic effects in Wason's selection task. However, in this comment, it is argued that their chosen experimental paradigm confounds most of their results. The task demands of the externalisation procedure (Green, 1995) enforce a correlation between card selections and the probability of finding a counterexample, which was the main finding of GOP's experiments. Consequently GOP cannot argue that their data support Kirby's (1994) proposal that people's normal strategy in the selection task is to seek falsifying evidence. Despite this methodological problem, effects of the probability of the antecedent ( p ) of a conditional rule, if p then q , predicted by Kirby (1994) and by Oaksford and Chater (1994) were observed, although they were inconsistent between Experiments 1 and 2. Moreover, the probability estimates that GOP collected, which are not vulnerable to that methodological criticism, do support the idea that when P ( p ) > P ( q ), participants revise P ( p ) down as suggested by Oaksford and Chater (1994).
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Think-Aloud Protocols and the Selection Task: Evidence for Relevance Effects and Rationalisation Processes.Erica Lucas & Linden Ball - 2005 - Thinking and Reasoning 11 (1):35 – 66.
Conditional Reasoning and the Wason Selection Task: Biconditional Interpretation Instead of Reasoning Bias.Pascal Wagner-Egger - 2007 - Thinking and Reasoning 13 (4):484 – 505.
Use or Misuse of the Selection Task? Rejoinder to Fiddick, Cosmides, and Tooby.Dan Sperber - 2002 - Cognition 85 (3):277-290.
Contrast Classes and Matching Bias as Explanations of the Effects of Negation on Conditional Reasoning.Mike Oaksford - 2002 - Thinking and Reasoning 8 (2):135 – 151.
Discussion de-Focusing on the Wason Selection Task: Mental Models or Mental Inference Rules? A Commentary on Green and Larking (1995).David K. Hardman - 1998 - Thinking and Reasoning 4 (1):83 – 94.
Bayesian Rationality for the Wason Selection Task? A Test of Optimal Data Selection Theory.Klaus Oberauer, Oliver Wilhelm & Ricardo Rosas Diaz - 1999 - Thinking and Reasoning 5 (2):115 – 144.
Added to index2009-02-11
Total downloads19 ( #259,718 of 2,171,689 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #173,816 of 2,171,689 )
How can I increase my downloads?