- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Weber and Rickert: Concept Formation in the Cultural Sciences
MIT Press (1988)
Abstract
Philosophers and social scientists will welcome this highly original discussion of Max Weber's analysis of the objectivity of social science. Guy Oakes traces the vital connection between Weber's methodology and the work of philosopher Heinrich Rickert, reconstructing Rickert's notoriously difficult concepts in order to isolate the important, and until now poorly understood, roots of problems in Weber's own work.Guy Oakes teaches social philosophy at Monmouth College and sociology at the New School for Social ResearchOther Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Guy Oakes, Weber and Rickert: Concept Formation in the Cultural Sciences.Charles Turner - 1990 - Radical Philosophy 54:46.
Book reviews : The limits of concept formation in natural science: A logical introduction to the historical sciences. Abridged edition. By Heinrich Rickert. Edited and translated by guy Oakes. Cambridge: Cambridge university press, 1986. Pp. XXXII + 240. $15.95. [REVIEW]H. P. Rickman - 1989 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 19 (3):401-404.
How are social-scientific concepts formed? A reconstruction of Max Weber's theory of concept formation.John Drysdale - 1996 - Sociological Theory 14 (1):71-88.
Webers idealtypus AlS methode zur bestimmung Des begriffsinhaltes theoretischer begriffe in den kulturwissenschaften.Gertrude Hirsch Hadorn - 1997 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 28 (2):275 - 296.
Il caso e la possibilità: Max Weber tra von Kries e Rickert.Edoardo Massimilla - 2009 - Rivista di Storia Della Filosofia 64 (3):491-504.
The Limits of Concept Formation in Natural Science. [REVIEW]Gary R. Weaver - 1988 - Review of Metaphysics 42 (1):167-168.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-02-06
Downloads
144 (#138,662)
6 months
13 (#401,322)
2014-02-06
Downloads
144 (#138,662)
6 months
13 (#401,322)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Neo-Kantianism and the Roots of Anti-Psychologism.R. Lanier Anderson - 2005 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 13 (2):287-323.
The pitiless 'sobriety of judgement': Max Weber between Carl Menger and Gustav von Schmoller — the academic politics of value freedom.Wilhelm Hennis - 1991 - History of the Human Sciences 4 (1):27-59.
Politics, History and Logic in Max Weber.Maurizio Ferrera - 2024 - History and Philosophy of Logic 45 (1):4-19.
On Method: The Fact of Science and the Distinction between Natural Science and the Humanities.Brigitte Falkenburg - 2020 - Kant Yearbook 12 (1):1-31.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-9b866bbb8-9kmcf uwo