From Skepticism to Paralysis

Ancient Philosophy 32 (2):369-392 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX


This paper analyzes the apraxia argument in Cicero’s Academica. It proposes that the argument assumes two modes: the evidential mode maintains that skepticism is false, while the pragmatic claims that it is disadvantageous. The paper then develops a tension between the two modes, and concludes by exploring some differences between ancient and contemporary skepticism.

Similar books and articles


Added to PP

279 (#57,771)

6 months
42 (#69,674)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Suzanne Obdrzalek
Claremont McKenna College

Citations of this work

Stoicism.Dirk Baltzly - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Scepticisme, apraxia et rationalité.Diego E. Machuca - 2019 - In Diego E. Machuca & Stéphane Marchand (eds.), Les raisons du doute: études sur le scepticisme antique. Paris: Classiques Garnier. pp. 53-87.
De praktische en epistemische waarde van het pyrronisme.Diego Machuca - 2016 - Algemeen Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Wijsbegeerte 108 (1):73-98.
Ancient skepticism.Leo Groarke - forthcoming - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The View From Nowhere.Thomas Nagel - 1986 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Elusive knowledge.David K. Lewis - 1996 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 74 (4):549 – 567.
The significance of philosophical scepticism.Barry Stroud - 1984 - New York: Oxford University Press.
The View from Nowhere.Thomas Nagel - 1986 - Behaviorism 15 (1):73-82.

View all 66 references / Add more references