Discussion. Deconstructing protocols: Reply to Uebel

Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/bjps/50.2.301
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 28,756
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Abstract Models for Dialogue Protocols.Raquel Fernández & Ulle Endriss - 2007 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 16 (2):121-140.
The Vienna Circle's 'Anti-Foundationalism'.Thomas Oberdan - 1998 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 49 (2):297-308.
Interpreting Neurath's Protocols. Reply to Nottelmann.Thomas Uebel - 2007 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 38 (2):383 - 391.
Protocols, Affirmations, and Foundations: Reply to Oberdan.Thomas E. Uebel - 1999 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 50 (2):297 - 300.
Discussion. Protocols, Affirmations, and Foundations: Reply to Oberdan.TE Uebel - 1999 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 50 (2):297-300.
Deconstructing Protocols: Reply to Uebel.Thomas Oberdan - 1999 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 50 (2):301 - 304.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

49 ( #107,943 of 2,178,142 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #316,663 of 2,178,142 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums