Rodopi (1993)

Authors
Thomas Oberdan
Clemson University
Abstract
The continuing philosophical interest in the famous 'Protocol Sentence Debate' in the Vienna Circle of Logical Positivists is, to a large measure, due to the focus on the epistemological issues in the dispute, and the neglect of differences among the leading players in their philosophical views of logic and language. In Protocols, Truth and Convention, the current understanding of the debate is advanced by developing the contemporaneous views of logic and language held by the principal disputants. Rudolf Carnap and Moritz Schlick. It is argued - largely on the basis of unpublished manuscripts and correspondence - that, despite apparent differences in their respective conceptions of language, there are nonetheless striking similarities, particularly with respect to the conventionality of language. Nonetheless, one key issue - concerning the syntacticism inherent in Carnap's early Thirties' philosophy - separates the two viewpoints in the clash over protocols. Finally, it is argued that Carnap's syntacticism is untenable, a conclusion that Carnap himself finally reached in the closing exchanges of the protocol sentence controversy
Keywords Carnap, Rudolf   Schlick, Moritz   Logical positivism
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy this book Find it on Amazon.com
ISBN(s) 9789051835380   9051835388   9789051835380   9051835388
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,319
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Vienna Circle.Thomas Uebel - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Carnap e o revisionismo.Gelson Liston - 2012 - Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology 16 (1):99-119.
Aspectos metafísicos na física de Newton: Deus.Bruno Camilo de Oliveira - 2011 - In Luiz Henrique de Araújo Dutra & Alexandre Meyer Luz (eds.), Coleção rumos da epistemologia. Florianópolis, SC, Brasil: pp. 186-201.
Carnap and Lewis on the External World.Ivan Ferreira da Cunha - 2014 - Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology 18 (2):243.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Protocols, Truth and Convention. [REVIEW]Thomas Uebel - 1995 - Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook 3:310-313.
Carnap and Quine on Truth by Convention.Gary Ebbs - 2011 - Mind 120 (478):193-237.
On the Logical Positivists' Theory of Truth: The Fundamental Problem and a New Perspective. [REVIEW]Lorenz B. Puntel - 1999 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 30 (1):101-130.
Positivism and the Pragmatic Theory of Observation.Thomas Oberdan - 1990 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:25 - 37.
‘‘Quine’s Evolution From ‘Carnap’s Disciple’ to the Author of “Two Dogmas.Greg Frost-Arnold - 2011 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 1 (2):291-316.
Logical Positivism, Part I.J. A. Passmore - 1943 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 21 (2-3).
Book Review: Protocols, Truth and Convention. [REVIEW]Gila Sher - 1997 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 35 (1):153-155.
Carnap, Formalism, and Informal Rigour.Gregory Lavers - 2008 - Philosophia Mathematica 16 (1):4-24.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-01-22

Total views
16 ( #642,818 of 2,448,683 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #447,034 of 2,448,683 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes