Specifying Rights Out of Necessity

Abstract
It is the purpose of this article to make the positive case for an under-appreciated conception of rights: specified rights. In contrast to rights conceived generally, a specified right can stand against different behaviour in different circumstances, so that what conflicts with a right in one context may not conflict with it in another. The specified conception of rights thus combines into a single inquiry the two questions that must be answered in invoking the general conception of rights, identifying the content of a right in light of what is justifiable to do under the circumstances. I present the case for specificationism in four sections, focusing on property rights. First, I argue that rights are based upon more fundamental reasons, and that this instrumentalism is compatible only with specificationism—a fact necessity cases illuminate. Next, I explain how specificationism embodies a fully moralized understanding of rights, and point to a dilemma that one faces in denying this. Third, I argue that the gap in property rights exposed in necessity cases entails that there is no right-based duty to compensate in such cases. Finally, I offer an error theory to explain the (false) attraction of the general conception of property rights.
Keywords Rights  Specificationism  Tort Theory
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/ojls/gqm028
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 28,824
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Prostitution, Disability and Prohibition.Frej Klem Thomsen - 2015 - Journal of Medical Ethics 41 (6):451-459.
Fairness and Equal Recognition.Denise G. Réaume - 2017 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 20 (1):63-74.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
In Defence of Infringement.Andrew Botterell - 2008 - Law and Philosophy 27 (3):269-292.
On Rights and Responsibilities.John Deign - 1988 - Law and Philosophy 7 (2):147-178.
Human Rights and Human Well-Being.W. J. Talbott - 2010 - Oxford University Press.
Intrinsic Limitations of Property Rights.J. M. Elegido - 1995 - Journal of Business Ethics 14 (5):411 - 416.
Collective Rights and Minority Rights.Seumas Miller - 2000 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 14 (2):241-257.
The Structure of Basic Human Rights.George E. Panichas - 1985 - Law and Philosophy 4 (3):343 - 375.
Corporate Property Rights.Larry May - 1986 - Journal of Business Ethics 5 (3):225 - 232.
Participation: The Right of Rights.Jeremy Waldron - 1998 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 98 (3):307–337.
Welfare Rights and Conflicts of Rights.Katherine Eddy - 2006 - Res Publica 12 (4):337-356.
Rights and Persons.A. I. Melden - 1977 - University of California Press.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2011-03-16

Total downloads

35 ( #148,784 of 2,178,178 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

3 ( #112,524 of 2,178,178 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums