Action explanation and its presuppositions

Canadian Journal of Philosophy 49 (1):123-146 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX


In debates about rationalizing action explanation causalists assume that the psychological states that explain an intentional action have both causal and rational features. I scrutinize the presuppositions of those who seek and offer rationalizing action explanations. This scrutiny shows, I argue, that where rational features play an explanatory role in these contexts, causal features play only a presuppositional role. But causal features would have to play an explanatory role if rationalizing action explanation were a species of causal explanation. Consequently, we should conclude that action explanation is not a species of causal explanation.

Similar books and articles

Reasons, causes, and action explanation.Mark Risjord - 2005 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 35 (3):294-306.
De Re and De Dicto Explanation of Action.Sean Crawford - 2012 - Philosophia 40 (4):783-798.
Laws, causality and the intentional explanation of action.Zhu Xu - 2010 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 5 (2):280-293.
Causal patterns and adequate explanations.Angela Potochnik - 2015 - Philosophical Studies 172 (5):1163-1182.
An Argument against the Causal Theory of Action Explanation.Scott R. Sehon - 2000 - Philosophical and Phenomenological Research 60 (1):67-85.
Teleological explanation: A species of causal explanation.D. Lynn Holt - 1988 - Philosophical Psychology 1 (3):313-325.
An argument against the causal theory of action explanation.Scott R. Sehon - 2000 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 60 (1):67-85.
Does Action Theory Rest on a Mistake?Alicia Juarrero Roqué - 1987 - Philosophy Research Archives 13:587-612.
Free Will and Action Explanation: A Non-Causal, Compatibilist Account.Scott Robert Sehon - 2016 - Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press UK.
Does Action Theory Rest on a Mistake?Alicia Juarrero Roqué - 1987 - Philosophy Research Archives 13:587-612.
Reasons explanations of actions: Causal, singular, and situational.Abraham S. Roth - 1999 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59 (4):839-874.
Newton’s “satis est”: A new explanatory role for laws.Lina Jansson - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 44 (4):553-562.


Added to PP

266 (#45,834)

6 months
47 (#28,454)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Lilian O'Brien
University of Helsinki

References found in this work

Actions, Reasons, and Causes.Donald Davidson - 1963 - Journal of Philosophy 60 (23):685.
Practical Reality.Jonathan Dancy - 2000 - Oxford University Press.
Motivation and Agency.Alfred R. Mele - 2003 - Oxford University Press.

View all 44 references / Add more references