The Subjective Authority of Intention

Philosophical Quarterly 69 (275):354-373 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

While much has been written about the functional profile of intentions, and about their normative or rational status, comparatively little has been said about the subjective authority of intention. What is it about intending that explains the ‘hold’ that an intention has on an agent—a hold that is palpable from her first-person perspective? I argue that several prima facie appealing explanations are not promising. Instead, I maintain that the subjective authority of intention can be explained in terms of the inner structure of intention. In adopting an intention the agent comes to see herself as criticizable depending on whether she executes the intention. This allows us to explain in first-personal terms why the agent becomes disposed to act and deliberate in ways that are characteristic of intention. As intention-formation involves profound changes to reflexive evaluative attitudes, this is the ‘Self-Evaluation’ view of the subjective authority of intention.

Similar books and articles

Are intentions self-referential?Alfred R. Mele - 1987 - Philosophical Studies 52 (3):309-329.
Modest sociality and the distinctiveness of intention.Michael E. Bratman - 2009 - Philosophical Studies 144 (1):149-165.
War and intention.Darrell Cole - 2011 - Journal of Military Ethics 10 (3):174-191.
A Preface Paradox for Intention.Simon Goldstein - 2016 - Philosophers' Imprint 16.
Intention and teleology.Matthew Hanser - 1995 - Mind 107 (426):381-401.
On the principle of intention agglomeration.Jing Zhu - 2010 - Synthese 175 (1):89 - 99.
Agency of belief and intention.A. K. Flowerree - 2017 - Synthese 194 (8):2763-2784.
Narrative and the Stability of Intention.Edward S. Hinchman - 2015 - European Journal of Philosophy 23 (1):111-140.
Just Cause and 'Right Intention'.Uwe Steinhoff - 2014 - Journal of Military Ethics 13 (1):32-48.
Intention and the authority of avowals.Andy Hamilton - 2008 - Philosophical Explorations 11 (1):23 – 37.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-12-09

Downloads
502 (#35,224)

6 months
91 (#43,924)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Lilian O'Brien
University of Helsinki

Citations of this work

Against Seizing the Day.Antti Kauppinen - 2021 - Oxford Studies in Normative Ethics 11:91-111.
Telic Perfectionism and the Badness of Pain.Antti Kauppinen - forthcoming - In Mauro Rossi & Christine Tappolet (eds.), Perspectives on Ill-Being. Oxford University Press.
Varieties of Normativity: Reasons, Expectations, Wide-scope oughts, and Ought-to-be’s.Arto Laitinen - 2020 - In Rachael Mellin, Raimo Tuomela & Miguel Garcia-Godinez (eds.), Social Ontology, Normativity and Law. Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter. pp. 133-158.
Intentional agency.Lilian O'Brien - 2022 - In Luca Ferrero (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Agency. New York, NY: Routledge. pp. 109-117.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

A virtue epistemology.Ernest Sosa - 2007 - New York: Oxford University Press.
The Normativity of Rationality.Benjamin Kiesewetter - 2017 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Autonomous Agents: From Self Control to Autonomy.Alfred R. Mele - 1995 - New York, US: Oxford University Press.
Why be rational.Niko Kolodny - 2005 - Mind 114 (455):509-563.
Reasons Without Rationalism.Kieran Setiya - 2007 - Princeton University Press.

View all 27 references / Add more references