Authors
John O'Callaghan
University of Notre Dame
Abstract
In “Verbum Mentis: Theological or Philosophical Doctrine?”, I argued against a common interpretation of Aquinas’s discussion of the verbum mentis. The common interpretation holds that the verbum mentis constitutes an essential part of Aquinas’s philosophical psychology. I argued, on the contrary, that it is no part of Aquinas’s philosophical psychology, but is a properly theological discussion grounded in the practice of scriptural metaphor, exemplified by such metaphors as “Christ is a rock.” James Doig challenges my alternate interpretation. His argument has three parts. He insists, first, that the discussion of the verbum mentis was a philosophical discussion in Aquinas’s predecessors, and that Aquinas never rejected this tradition; second, that it appears as a philosophical discussion in Aquinas’s commentary on the Gospel of John; third, that in the Summa theologiae, while there is no philosophical reason for Aquinas to discuss the verbum mentis in the context of the essence, powers, and operations of the soul, it is nevertheless a philosophical discussion in the examination of thedivine Trinity Here I respond to and argue against all three legs of Doig’s counterargument.
Keywords Catholic Tradition  Contemporary Philosophy  History of Philosophy  Philosophy and Religion
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 1051-3558
DOI acpq200377213
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,636
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Concept as a Formal Sign.Thomas Osborne - 2010 - Semiotica 2010 (179):1-21.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

O’Callaghan on Verbum Mentis in Aquinas.James C. Doig - 2003 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 77 (2):233-255.
Verbum Mentis: Theological or Philosophical Doctrine.John P. O’Callaghan - 2000 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 74:103-119.
“The Word is Not Reflexive”: Mind and World in Aquinas and Gadamer.John Arthos - 2004 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 78 (4):581-608.
The Interpretation of Aquinas’s Prima Secundae.James C. Doig - 1997 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 71 (2):171-195.
Verbum: Word and Idea in Aquinas. [REVIEW]Garrett Barden - 1968 - Philosophical Studies (Dublin) 17:250-254.
Verbum Mentis: Philosophical or Theological Doctrine in Aquinas?John P. O’Callaghan - 2000 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 74:103-119.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-01-09

Total views
29 ( #383,176 of 2,462,283 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,321 of 2,462,283 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes