Rabbinic text process theology

Journal of Jewish Thought and Philosophy 1 (1):141-177 (1992)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

What would a Jewish process theology look like if it also adopted the a priori principles of rabbinic Judaism - among them, the authority of Torah given on Sinai, an historically particular revelation of divine instruction for a particular people, and the authority of the Oral Torah, an historically evolving hermeneutic, according to which that revelation becomes normative practice for communities of observant Jews? I trust this would not be a naturalism, since it would be a theology that found its grammar or regulative logic in a textual hermeneutic rather than in an account of the orders of perception and imagination. It would not, for the same token, be an anti-naturalism, but rather a theology for which the distinction between natural and super- or non-natural was not definitional. For such a theology, for example, the world out there would belong to the order of creation (maaseh bereshit), rather than to "nature." This would mean that, since God creates through words, language (at least some sort of language) and world would be intimately connected rather than extrinsic phenomena, It would mean, furthermore, that for language to "know" the world would not be surprising and that something like a form of realism would not be out of the question, While it would presuppose the authority of divine speech and even of some human interpretations of it, this other-than natural theology would not, as naturalists might suppose, present a heteronomous conception of divine law, If the distinction nature/not nature would not be definitive for this theology, neither would those of autonomy/heteronomy, body/spirit, this world/other world, This theology would present its own variety of neutral monism; in this case, however, the undifferentiated plenum would be termed a plenum of undifferentiated signification (or pure semiosis), of which undifferentiated feeling (or pure experience) was an instance; "prehension" would be another term for interpretation, Max Kadushin was the first and, as far as I know, the only Jewish thinker to articulate a process theology in the service of what he considered the behavioral or halakhic authority of classical rabbinic literature. In this paper, I examine Kadushin's work as the foundation of a rabbinic text process theology, I assume, from the outset, that such a theology may complement a Jewish natural process theology and that a Jewish process theology, in general, would appear as a process of dialogue between textual- andnatural-process theologies.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-14

Downloads
124 (#134,335)

6 months
78 (#49,689)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Peter Ochs
University of Virginia

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Issues of Pragmaticism.Charles S. Peirce - 1906 - Philosophical Review 15:565.
Maktab-i falsafī-i Iṣfahān.Mudarris Muṭlaq & Muḥammad ʻAlī - 2010 - Tihrān: a Muʼassasah-i Taʼlīf, Tarjumah va Nashr-i Ās̲ār-i Hunarī-i "Matn".

Add more references