Ruch Filozoficzny 74 (4):71–98 (2018)

Authors
Takaharu Oda
Trinity College, Dublin
Abstract
A plausible reading of Berkeley’s view of voluntary motion is occasionalism; this, however, leads to a specious conclusion against his argument of human action. Differing from an unqualified occasionalist reading, I consider the alternative reading that Berkeley is a conservationist regarding bodily motion by the human mind at will. That is, finite minds (spirits) immediately cause motions in their body parts, albeit under the divine conservation. My argument then comports with the conservationist reading from three perspectives: (i) theodicy that the human mind is held liable for sinful actions; (ii) an account of the human mind influencing other minds; and (iii) an improper but necessary directing principle of the human mind. This article is a stepping stone to grasping why the conservationist reading is more coherent than the occasionalist one.
Keywords Berkeley  occasionalism  concurrentism  conservationism  volition  action  motion
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2019
DOI 10.12775/rf.2018.039
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Consequentialism.Walter Sinnott-Armstrong - 2019 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Responsibility From the Margins.David Shoemaker - 2015 - Oxford University Press.
Stoicism.Dirk Baltzly - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

View all 39 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Berkeley, Human Agency and Divine Concurrentism.Jeffrey K. McDonough - 2008 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 46 (4):pp. 567-590.
Berkeley's Immaterialist Account of Action.Patrick Fleming - 2006 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 44 (3):415-429.
Berkeley's Immaterialist Account of Action.Patrick Fleming - 2006 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 44 (3):415-429.
Matter and Spirit in Berkeley.Robert James Mckim - 1982 - Dissertation, Yale University
Cartesian Causation: Continuous, Instantaneous, Overdetermined.Geoffrey Gorham - 2004 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 42 (4):389-423.
Reply to Professor Mirarchi.Bruce Silver - 1977 - Journal of the History of Ideas 38 (4):714.
Berkeley's Case Against Realism About Dynamics.Lisa Downing - 1995 - In Robert G. Muehlmann (ed.), Berkeley's Metaphysics: Structural, Interpretive, and Critical Essays. The Pennsylvania State University Press. pp. 197--214.
Berkeley on the “Twofold State of Things”.Melissa Frankel - 2016 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 80 (1):43-60.
Was Berkeley a Subjective Idealist?G. Callahan - 2015 - Collingwood and British Idealism Studies 21 (2):157-184.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-02-12

Total views
197 ( #47,711 of 2,411,664 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
31 ( #25,826 of 2,411,664 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes