Armstrong on the eleatic principle and abstract entities

Philosophical Studies 41 (2):285 - 295 (1982)
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF00354868
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 26,173
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Dispositions.John Heil - 2005 - Synthese 144 (3):343-356.
Ordinary Objects.Daniel Z. Korman - 2011 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
No Simples, No Gunk, No Nothing.Sam Cowling - 2014 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 95 (1):246-260.

View all 11 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Universals: Ways or Things?Scott Berman - 2008 - Metaphysica 9 (2):219-234.
How to Be an Eleatic Monist.Michael C. Rea - 2001 - Noûs 35 (s15):129-151.
The Ethics of Empty Worlds.Roy Sorenson - 2005 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 83 (3):349-356.
Ockham's Razor and the Identity of Indiscernables.Raja A. Bahlul - 1988 - Philosophy Research Archives 14:405-414.
Armstrong's Conception of Supervenience.Markku Keinänen - 2008 - In Tim de Mey & Markku Keinänen (eds.), Problems From Armstrong. Acta Philosophica Fennica 84. pp. 51.
Can the Eleatic Principle Be Justified?Mark Colyvan - 1998 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 28 (3):313 - 335.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

110 ( #43,437 of 2,152,501 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

14 ( #35,937 of 2,152,501 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums