This article challenges the view most recently expounded by Emily Jackson that ‘decisional privacy’ ought to be respected in the realm of artificial reproduction (AR). On this view, it is considered an unjust infringement of individual liberty for the state to interfere with individual or group freedom artificially to produce a child. It is our contention that a proper evaluation of AR and of the relevance of welfare will be sensitive not only to the rights of ‘commissioning parties’ to AR but also to public policy considerations. We argue that AR has implications for the common good, by involving matters of human reproduction, kinship, race, parenthood and identity. In this paper we challenge presuppositions concerning decisional privacy. We examine the essential commodification of human life implicit in AR and the systematicity that makes this possible. We address the objection that it is an ethically neutral way of having children and consider the problem of ‘existential debt’. After examining objections to the thesis that AR is illegitimate for reasons of public policy and the common good, we return to the issue of decisional privacy in the light of considerations concerning the legitimate role of the state in matters affecting human reproduction.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Truly Human Reproduction.Alexander R. Cohen - 2007 - Journal of Philosophical Research 32 (Supplement):305-313.
Inequality, Injustice and Levelling Down.Thomas Christiano & Will Braynen - 2008 - Ratio 21 (4):392-420.
What is the Rational Care Theory of Welfare? A Comment on Stephen Darwall's Welfare and Rational Care.Fred Feldman - manuscript
Posthumous Reproduction and the Presumption Against Consent in Cases of Death Caused by Sudden Trauma.Rebecca Collins - 2005 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (4):431 – 442.
Good Faith and Fair Dealing in Contracts Formed and Performed by Electronic Agents.Emily M. Weitzenböck - 2004 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 12 (1-2):83-110.
Common Good Leadership in Business Management: An Ethical Model From the Indian Tradition.John M. Alexander & Jane Buckingham - 2011 - Business Ethics 20 (4):317-327.
Zoo Animal Welfare.Dita Wickins-Dražilová - 2005 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 19 (1):27-36.
Engineering Human Reproduction: A Challenge to Public Policy.Samuel Gorovitz - 1985 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 10 (3):267-274.
Artificial Reproduction, the 'Welfare Principle', and the Common Good.Jacqueline A. Laing - 2005 - Medical Law Review 13:328-356.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads34 ( #151,941 of 2,172,037 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #325,336 of 2,172,037 )
How can I increase my downloads?