Journal of Medical Ethics 43 (4):192-200 (2017)

Authors
David S. Oderberg
University of Reading
Abstract
I explore the increasingly important issue of co-operation in immoral actions, particularly in connection with health care. Conscientious objection, especially as pertains to religious freedom in health care, has become a pressing issue in the light of the US Supreme Court judgment in Hobby Lobby. Section 2 outlines a theory of co-operation inspired by Catholic moral theologians such as those cited by the Court. The theory has independent plausibility and is at least worthy of serious consideration – in part because it is an instance of double-effect reasoning, which is also independently plausible despite its association with moral theology. Section 3 examines Hobby Lobby in detail. Even if the judgment was correct in that case, the reasoning was not, as it involved applying a ‘mere sincerity’ test to the co-operation question. The mere sincerity test leads to absurd consequences, whereas a reasonableness test applied using the theory of co-operation defended here would avoid absurdity. Section 4 explores the post-Hobby Lobby problem further, examining opt-outs and accommodations: the Little Sisters of the Poor case shows how opt-outs are misunderstood on a mere sincerity test, which the court rightly rejected. Section 5 discusses the UK case of Doogan and Wood, concerning participation in abortion. Again, a judicially-recognised ethic of co-operation, if it were part of the fabric of legal reasoning in such cases, would have enabled the conscientious objectors in this and similar situations to have their freedom of conscience and religion respected in a way that it currently is not.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1136/medethics-2016-103476
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 50,556
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Ethics of Co-Operation in Wrongdoing.David Simon Oderberg - 2004 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 54:203-227.
Moral Theory.David S. Oderberg - 2001 - Mind 110 (438):531-534.
Man as Man, the Science and Art of Ethics.T. J. Higgins - 1950 - Philosophy 25 (95):368-370.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

How Special is Medical Conscience?David S. Oderberg - 2019 - The New Bioethics 25 (3):207-220.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

As Moral as We Need to Be.D. Krebs - 2000 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 7 (1-2):139-143.
Self Governance and Cooperation.Robert H. Myers - 1999 - Oxford University Press UK.
How Should Philosophy Be Clear? Loaded Clarity, Default Clarity, and Adorno.Nicholas Joll - 2009 - Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 2009 (146):73–95.
The Inescapability of Moral Reasons.R. H. Myers - 1999 - Philosophical and Phenomenological Research 59 (2):281-307.
Liberal Morality and Socialist Morality.W. B. Gallie - 1949 - Philosophy 24 (91):318 - 334.
The Relevance of Decision Theory to Ethical Theory.Jan Narveson - 2010 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 13 (5):497-520.
The Scope of Instrumental Morality.Michael Moehler - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 167 (2):431-451.
The Inescapability of Moral Reasons.R. H. Myers - 1999 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59 (2):281-307.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-09-23

Total views
92 ( #99,295 of 2,326,770 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #162,231 of 2,326,770 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes