In E. Wright (ed.), The Case for Qualia. MIT Press. pp. 299 (2008)
If we assume that the operation of each sense modality constitutes a different experience – a visual experience, an auditory experience, etc – we are faced with the problem of how those distinct experiences come together to form a unified perceptual encounter with the world. Michael Tye has recently argued that the best way to get around this problem is to deny altogether that there are such things as purely visual (and so forth) experiences. Here I aim to show not simply that Tye’s proposed solution fails, but that its failure is highly instructive because it allows us to see that the transparency thesis, which lies at the heart of the case against qualia, and of most representationalist theories of experience, is more problematic than is often supposed.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Michael Tye, Consciousness and Persons; Unity and Identity.Susan A. J. Stuart - 2007 - Minds and Machines 17 (3):365-367.
Why Experience Told Me Nothing About Transparency.Bernard Molyneux - 2009 - Noûs 43 (1):116-136.
Heirs of Nothing: The Implications of Transparency.Matthew Kennedy - 2009 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 79 (3):574-604.
Reticence of Visual Phenomenal Character: A Spatial Interpretation of Transparency.Robert Schroer - 2007 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 85 (3):393-414.
Representationalism and the Transparency of Experience.Michael Tye - 2002 - Noûs 36 (1):137-51.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads138 ( #32,337 of 2,146,275 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #185,331 of 2,146,275 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.