Absurdity as unary operator
Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 91 (1):225-242 (2006)
Abstract |
It was shown in the previous work of the author that one can avoid the paradox of minimal logic { ϕ , ¬ ϕ } ¬ ψ defining the negation operator via reduction not a constant of absurdity, but to a unary operator of absurdity. In the present article we study in details what does it mean that negation in a logical system can be represented via an absurdity or contradiction operator. We distinguish different sorts of such presentations. Finally, we consider the possibility to represent the negation via absurdity and contradiction operators in such well known systems of paraconsistent logic as D.Batens's logic CLuN and Sette's logic P 1.
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Wittgensteinian Accounts of Moorean Absurdity.John N. Williams - 1998 - Philosophical Studies 92 (3):283-306.
Moore’s Paradoxes and Iterated Belief.John N. Williams - 2007 - Journal of Philosophical Research 32:145-168.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2009-01-28
Total views
18 ( #478,934 of 2,271,073 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #832,952 of 2,271,073 )
2009-01-28
Total views
18 ( #478,934 of 2,271,073 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #832,952 of 2,271,073 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads