Karl Barth and Ramsey's "Uses of Power"

Journal of Religious Ethics 19 (2):1 - 30 (1991)
Paul Ramsey's criticism of Karl Barth 's Christological account of the state was based on a misconception of Barth's eschatology, but reflected, for all that, real differences in theology and political theory. The theological differences were susceptible of reconciliation, possibly to both thinkers' advantage; but differences of political theory, hardly recognised, which turned upon the legacy of contractarianism in Western liberal thought, kept their views apart.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 23,664
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Darren O. Sumner (2011). Common Actualization: Karl Barth's Recovery and Reappropriation of the Communication of Natures. Neue Zeitschrift für Systematicsche Theologie Und Religionsphilosophie 53 (4):465-479.
Nicholas Wolterstorff (1996). Barth on Evil. Faith and Philosophy 13 (4):584-608.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

7 ( #499,669 of 1,902,964 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

2 ( #324,600 of 1,902,964 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.