Social justice, psychology, and outdated epistemologies: Commentary on Sugarman, Stam, Teo, and Walsh

Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 35 (2):135-139 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Henderikus J. Stam.Social Constructionism - 2000 - In Kurt Pawlik & Mark R. Rosenzweig (eds.), International Handbook of Psychology. Sage Publications.
The personal and political economy of psychologists’ desires for social justice.Richard T. G. Walsh & Ravi Gokani - 2014 - Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 34 (1):41-55.
Psychology and the moral imperative.Isaac Prilleltensky & Richard Walsh-Bowers - 1993 - Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 13 (2):90-102.
Some problems for alternative individualism.Robert A. Wilson - 2000 - Philosophy of Science 67 (4):671-679.
Is there a “people are stupid” school in social psychology?John F. Kihlstrom - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (3):348-348.
Social justice and legal justice.Wojciech Sadurski - 1984 - Law and Philosophy 3 (3):329 - 354.
On the Virtues and Plausibility of Feminist Epistemologies.Pieranna Garavaso & Nicla Vassallo - 2003 - Epistemologia, Rivista Italiana di Filosofia Della Scienza (1):99-131.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-08-27

Downloads
16 (#880,136)

6 months
5 (#652,053)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Deliberative public opinion.Kieran C. O’Doherty - 2017 - History of the Human Sciences 30 (4):124-145.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references