Protocol for a scoping review to understand what is known about how GPs make decisions with, for and on behalf of patients who lack capacity
BMJ Open 10 (2020)
Abstract
General Practitioners (GPs) and allied healthcare professionals working in primary care are regularly required to make decisions with, for and on behalf of patients who lack capacity. In England and Wales, these decisions are made for incapacitated adult patients under the Mental Capacity Act 2005, which primarily requires that decisions are made in the patient’s ‘best interests’. Regarding children, decisions are also made in their best interests but are done so under the Children Act 1989, which places paramount importance on the welfare of the child. Decisions for children are usually made by parents, but a GP may become involved if he or she feels a parent is not acting in the best interests of the child. Internationally, including elsewhere in the UK, different approaches are taken. We hypothesise that, despite the legislation and professional guidelines, there are many different approaches taken by GPs and allied healthcare professionals in England and Wales when making these complex decisions with, for and on behalf of patients who lack capacity. To better understand what is known about how these decisions are made, we plan to undertake a scoping review and directed content analysis of the literature. While the majority of decisions made in primary care are made by GPs, for completeness, this review will include all allied healthcare professionals working in primary care.My notes
Similar books and articles
Capacity and Consent in England and Wales: The Mental Capacity Act under Scrutiny.Peter N. Herissone-Kelly - 2010 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 19 (3):344-352.
Best interests versus resource allocation: could COVID-19 cloud decision-making for the cognitively impaired?Jordan A. Parsons & Harleen Kaur Johal - 2020 - Journal of Medical Ethics 46 (7):447-450.
Making Medical Decisions for Incapacitated Patients Without Proxies: Part I.Cynthia Griggins, Eric Blackstone, Lauren McAliley & Barbara Daly - 2020 - HEC Forum 32 (1):33-45.
Medical mismanagement or public vacillation?P. N. Bamford - 1981 - Journal of Medical Ethics 7 (4):179-181.
Ethical challenges faced by healthcare professionals who care for suicidal patients: a scoping review.Eric Racine & Victoria Saigle - 2018 - Monash Bioethics Review 35 (1-4):50-79.
Care versus treatment at the end of life for profoundly disabled persons.Jeffrey P. Spike - 2012 - Journal of Clinical Ethics 23 (1):79.
Introduction: Children and Consent to Treatment. [REVIEW]James Stacey Taylor - 2013 - HEC Forum 25 (4):285-287.
Clarifying Capacity: Reasons and Value.Jules Holroyd - forthcoming - In Lubomira Radoilska (ed.), Autonomy and Mental Health. Oxford University Press.
Considerations for Introducing Legislation on Advance Decisions in Malaysia.Mark Tan Kiak Min - 2018 - Asian Bioethics Review 10 (1):87-92.
What healthcare professionals owe us: why their duty to treat during a pandemic is contingent on personal protective equipment.Udo Schuklenk - 2020 - Journal of Medical Ethics 46 (7):432-435.
Ethicists, doctors and triage decisions: who should decide? And on what basis?Silvia Camporesi & Maurizio Mori - 2021 - Journal of Medical Ethics 47 (12):e18-e18.
Decisions Relating to Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: a joint statement from the British Medical Association, the Resuscitation Council (UK) and the Royal College of Nursing.British Medical Association - 2001 - Journal of Medical Ethics 27 (5):310.
Decisions Regarding Hospice Care for Isolated Patients.Timothy W. Kirk & Randi Erin Seigel - 2016 - NYSBA Health Law Journal 21 (3):56-60.
Deprivation of liberty safeguards: how prepared are we?P. Lepping, R. S. Sambhi & K. Williams-Jones - 2010 - Journal of Medical Ethics 36 (3):170-173.
Analytics
Added to PP
2020-12-12
Downloads
0
6 months
0
2020-12-12
Downloads
0
6 months
0
Historical graph of downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
References found in this work
Clarifying the best interests standard: the elaborative and enumerative strategies in public policy-making.Chong Ming Lim, Michael C. Dunn & Jacqueline J. Chin - 2016 - Journal of Medical Ethics 42 (8):542-549.