Abstract
N. D. Mermin has proposed an “elaboration” of Einstein's 1905 derivation that supposedly fixes the flaws that I identified in this derivation. By specific examples taken from Einstein's own later work, I show that Mermin's elaboration is fraught with misconceptions
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1016/j.shpsb.2012.03.002
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,226
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Space-Time-Matter.Hermann Weyl - 1922 - E.P. Dutton and Company.
Space-Time-Matter.Hermann Weyl & Henry L. Brose - 1953 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 3 (12):382-382.
Did Einstein Prove E=Mc2?Hans C. Ohanian - 2009 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 40 (2):167-173.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Reply to Ohanian's Comment.N. David Mermin - 2012 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 43 (3):218-219.
Reply to Ohanian's Comment.N. David Mermin - 2012 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 43 (3):218-219.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Understanding Einstein's 1905 Derivation of E=Mc2.N. David Mermin - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 42 (1):1-2.
Einstein’s 1935 Derivation of E=Mc2.Francisco Flores - 1998 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 29 (2):223-243.
Did Einstein Prove E=Mc2?Hans C. Ohanian - 2009 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 40 (2):167-173.
Reply to Ohanian's Comment.N. David Mermin - 2012 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 43 (3):218-219.
Poincare's Contributions to Relativistic Dynamics.Galina Granek - 2000 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 31 (1):15-48.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2012-06-14

Total views
24 ( #471,195 of 2,499,707 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #418,066 of 2,499,707 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes