Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (1):79-80 (1997)
Learning is the acquisition of knowledge, not of input/output mappings. The distinction between statistical and relational learning, as Clark & Thornton define those terms, is not useful because all human learning is relational. However, prior knowledge does influence later learning and the sequence in which learning tasks are encountered is indeed crucial. Simulations of sequence effects would be interesting.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Contemporary Theories of Learning: Learning Theorists -- In Their Own Words.Knud Illeris (ed.) - 2009 - Routledge.
Intention, Attention, and Consciousness in Probabilistic Sequence Learning.Luis Jimenez - 2003 - In Attention and Implicit Learning. John Benjamins.
Conceptual Development and the Paradox of Learning.Michael Luntley - 2008 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 42 (1):1-14.
Conceptual Learning: The Priority for Higher Education.Effie Maclellan - 2005 - British Journal of Educational Studies 53 (2):129 - 147.
Is Culture Inherited Through Social Learning?Kenneth Reisman - 2007 - Biological Theory 2 (3):300-306.
Mechanisms of Implicit Learning: Connectionist Models of Sequence Processing.Axel Cleeremans - 1993 - MIT Press.
Implicit Probabilistic Sequence Learning is Independent of Explicit Awareness.Sunbin Song, Howard Jr, James H. & Darlene V. Howard - 2007 - Learning and Memory 14 (1-6):167-176.
Relational Problems Are Not Fully Solved by a Temporal Sequence of Statistical Learning Episodes.A. Vinter & P. Perruchet - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (1):82-82.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads20 ( #244,741 of 2,158,136 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #356,322 of 2,158,136 )
How can I increase my downloads?