Apeiron 34 (4):269 - 305 (2001)

Authors
Tim O'Keefe
Georgia State University
Abstract
Epicurus is strongly committed to psychological and ethical egoism and hedonism. However, these commitments do not square easily with many of the claims made by Epicureans about friendship: for instance, that the wise man will sometimes die for his friend, that the wise man will love his friend as much as himself, feel exactly the same toward his friend as toward himself, and exert himself as much for his friend's pleasure as for his own, and that every friendship is worth choosing for its own sake. These claims have led some scholars to assert that Epicurus inconsistently affirms that friendship has an altruistic element. I argue that the Epicurean claims about friendship can be reconciled with egoism and hedonism in psychology and ethics. Friendship is valuable because having friends provides one with security more effectively than any other means, and having confidence that one will be secure in the future either is identical to ataraxia, or the grounds on which one has it.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1515/APEIRON.2001.34.4.269
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 50,100
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Invulnerable Pleasures of Epicurean Friendship.David O'Connor - 1989 - Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 30:165–86.
Epicurus on the Telos.Jeffrey Purinton - 1993 - Phronesis 38 (3):281 - 320.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Reconciling Justice and Pleasure in Epicurean Contractarianism.John J. Thrasher - 2013 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16 (2):423-436.
The Ethical Significance of Gratitude in Epicureanism.Benjamin A. Rider - 2019 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 27 (6):1092-1112.
The Annicerean Cyrenaics on Friendship and Habitual Good Will.Tim O’Keefe - 2017 - Phronesis: A Journal for Ancient Philosophy 62 (3):305-318.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Advantages of Civic Friendship.Joyce L. Jenkins - 1999 - Journal of Philosophical Research 24:459-471.
Could an Egoist Be a Friend?Joe Mintoff - 2006 - American Philosophical Quarterly 43 (2):101 - 118.
Friendship and Moral Danger.Dean Cocking & Jeanette Kennett - 2000 - Journal of Philosophy 97 (5):278-296.
Cracking the Mirror: On Kierkegaard’s Concerns About Friendship. [REVIEW]John Lippitt - 2007 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 61 (3):131 - 150.
Friendship.Bennett W. Helm - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Why Virtual Friendship is No Genuine Friendship.Barbro Fröding & Martin Peterson - 2012 - Ethics and Information Technology 14 (3):201-207.
Civic Friendship and Thin Citizenship.R. K. Bentley - 2013 - Res Publica 19 (1):5-19.
Friendship With God?Wanda Cizewski - 1992 - Philosophy and Theology 6 (4):369-381.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-05-29

Total views
138 ( #63,120 of 2,324,545 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #91,531 of 2,324,545 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes