In Donncha O'Rourke (ed.), Approaches to Lucretius: traditions and innovations in reading De Rerum Natura. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 177-194 (2020)

Tim O'Keefe
Georgia State University
The first part of this paper looks into the question of Lucretius’ philosophical sources and whether he draws almost exclusively from Epicurus himself or also from later Epicurean texts. I argue that such debates are inconclusive and likely will remain so, even if additional Epicurean texts are discovered, and that even if we were able to ascertain Lucretius’ philosophical sources, doing so would add little to our understanding of the De Rerum Natura. The second part of the paper turns to a consideration of what Lucretius does with his philosophical sources. The arguments within the De Rerum Natura are not original. Nonetheless, the way Lucretius presents these arguments establishes him as a distinctive philosopher. Lucretius deploys non-argumentative methods of persuasion such as appealing to emotions, redeploying powerful cultural tropes, and ridicule. These methods of persuasion do not undercut or displace reasoned argumentation. Instead, they complement it. Lucretius’ use of these methods is rooted in his understanding of human psychology, that we have been culturally conditioned to have empty desires, false beliefs, and destructive emotions, ones that are often subconscious. Effective persuasion must take into account the biases, stereotypes, and other psychological factors that hinder people from accepting Epicurus’ healing gospel.
Keywords Quellenforschung  David Sedley  Martha Nussbaum
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy the book Find it on
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 59,827
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Cambridge Companion to Lucretius.Stuart Gillespie & Philip Hardie (eds.) - 2007 - Cambridge University Press.
Pattern of Sound and Atomistic Theory in Lucretius.P. Friedlnder - 2007 - In Monica Gale (ed.), Lucretius. Oxford University Press.
Lucretius the Epicurean : On the History of Man.David J. Furley - 2007 - In Monica Gale (ed.), Lucretius. Oxford University Press.
Argumentation as Rational Persuasion.J. Anthony Blair - 2012 - Argumentation 26 (1):71-81.
Lucretius and the History of Science.Monte Ransome Johnson & Catherine Wilson - 2007 - In Stuart Gillespie & Philip R. Hardie (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Lucretius. Cambridge University Press.
Lucretius 5. 979.J. H. Molyneux - 1959 - Classical Quarterly 9 (3-4):164-.
Lucretius 5. 979.J. H. Molyneux - 1959 - Classical Quarterly 9 (3-4):164-165.
Somnia Ficta In Lucretius And Lucilius.James J. O.′Hara - 1987 - Classical Quarterly 37 (2):517-519.


Added to PP index

Total views
24 ( #443,122 of 2,432,740 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #464,418 of 2,432,740 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes