The Ontological Status of Sensible Qualities for Democritus and Epicurus

Ancient Philosophy 17 (1):119-134 (1997)
Authors
Tim O'Keefe
Georgia State University
Abstract
One striking oddity about Democritus and Epicurus is that, even though Epicurus' theory of perception is largely the same as that of Democritus, Democritus and his followers draw skeptical conclusions from this theory of perception, whereas Epicurus declares that all perceptions are true or real. I believe that the dispute between Democritus and Epicurus stems from a question over what sort of ontological status should be assigned to sensible qualities. In this paper, I address three questions: 1) Why were Democritus and his followers skeptical? 2) How did Epicurus modify Democritus' metaphysics in order to avoid these skeptical conclusions? and 3) How successful was he? 1) I argue that Democritus allows only the intrinsic properties of atoms into his ontology, and then runs into skeptical difficulties because of the relativity of perception. 2) I propose that Epicurus modifies Democritus' ontology by allowing dispositional and relational properties as real properties of bodies. Sensible qualities are conceptualized as dispositional properties of bodies to cause certain experiences in percipients. 3) I argue that Epicurus does not run into the same problems as Democritus. Finally, I consider how my interpretation of Epicurus' ontology helps to make sense of his claim that all perceptions are alethes--'true' or 'real.'
Keywords Ancient Philosophy  Classical Studies  History of Philosophy
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0740-2007
DOI 10.5840/ancientphil19971716
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 38,077
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Epicurus on Truth and Falsehood.Alexander Bown - 2016 - Phronesis 61 (4):463–503.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-11-23

Total views
84 ( #81,660 of 2,313,328 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #198,791 of 2,313,328 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature