Losing Stuff Down a Black Hole
Foundations of Physics 48 (4):411-428 (2018)
Abstract
Over the years, the so-called black hole information loss paradox has generated an amazingly diverse set of proposals. However, 40 years after the introduction of Hawking’s radiation, there continues to be a debate regarding whether the effect does, in fact, lead to an actual problem. In this paper we try to clarify some aspect of the discussion by describing two possible perspectives regarding the landscape of the information loss issue. Moreover, we advance a fairly conservative point of view regarding the relation between evaporating black holes and the rest of physics, which leads us to advocate a generalized breakdown of unitarity. We conclude by exploring some implications of our proposal in relation with conservation laws.Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
The Black Hole Information Paradox and the Collapse of the Wave Function.Elias Okon & Daniel Sudarsky - 2015 - Foundations of Physics 45 (4):461-470.
Interpretation of Singularities in General Relativity and the Information Loss Paradox.Cristi Stoica - manuscript
Interpretation of Singularities in General Relativity and the Information Loss Paradox (version 2).Cristi Stoica - manuscript
Hiding Information in Theories Beyond Quantum Mechanics, and It’s Application to the Black Hole Information Problem.Markus P. Müller, Jonathan Oppenheim & Oscar C. O. Dahlsten - 2014 - Foundations of Physics 44 (8):829-842.
The limits of information.D. J. - 2001 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 32 (4):511-524.
Does Black Hole Complementarity Answer Hawking’s Information Loss Paradox?Peter Bokulich - 2005 - Philosophy of Science 72 (5):1336-1349.
Interactions and the Consistency of Black Hole Complementarity.Peter Bokulich - 2011 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 25 (4):371-386.
Black Holes, Information Loss and the Measurement Problem.Elias Okon & Daniel Sudarsky - 2017 - Foundations of Physics 47 (1):120-131.
Black Hole Remnants and Classical vs. Quantum Gravity.Peter Bokulich - 2001 - Philosophy of Science 68 (S3):S407-S423.
Black hole remnants and classical vs. quantum gravity.Peter Bokulich - 2001 - Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association 2001 (3):S407-.
Black Hole Unitarity and Antipodal Entanglement.Gerard ’T. Hooft - 2016 - Foundations of Physics 46 (9):1185-1198.
Programming relativity and gravity via a discrete pixel space in Planck level Simulation Hypothesis models.Malcolm J. Macleod - manuscript
The Firewall Transformation for Black Holes and Some of Its Implications.Gerard ’T. Hooft - 2017 - Foundations of Physics 47 (12):1503-1542.
Cosmic intelligence and Black holes.Vladimir A. Lefebvre & Yuri N. Efremov - 2008 - World Futures 64 (8):563 – 576.
Analytics
Added to PP
2018-03-17
Downloads
23 (#501,637)
6 months
1 (#448,551)
2018-03-17
Downloads
23 (#501,637)
6 months
1 (#448,551)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Evaporating Black-Holes, Wormholes, and Vacuum Polarisation: Must they Always Conserve Charge?Jonathan Gratus, Paul Kinsler & Martin W. McCall - 2019 - Foundations of Physics 49 (4):330-350.
References found in this work
Less Decoherence and More Coherence in Quantum Gravity, Inflationary Cosmology and Elsewhere.Elias Okon & Daniel Sudarsky - 2016 - Foundations of Physics 46 (7):852-879.
The Black Hole Information Paradox and the Collapse of the Wave Function.Elias Okon & Daniel Sudarsky - 2015 - Foundations of Physics 45 (4):461-470.
Black Holes, Information Loss and the Measurement Problem.Elias Okon & Daniel Sudarsky - 2017 - Foundations of Physics 47 (1):120-131.
A novel explanation for the very special initial state of the universe.Elias Okon & Daniel Sudarsky - unknown