The weight of collapse: dynamical reduction models in general relativistic contexts
Abstract
Inspired by possible connections between gravity and foundational question in quantum theory, we consider an approach for the adaptation of objective collapse models to a general relativistic context. We apply these ideas to a list of open problems in cosmology and quantum gravity, such as the emergence of seeds of cosmic structure, the black hole information issue, the problem of time in quantum gravity and, in a more speculative manner, to the nature of dark energy and the origin of the very special initial state of the universe. We conclude that objective collapse models offer a rather promising path to deal with all of these issues.Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
A novel explanation for the very special initial state of the universe.Elias Okon & Daniel Sudarsky - unknown
Less Decoherence and More Coherence in Quantum Gravity, Inflationary Cosmology and Elsewhere.Elias Okon & Daniel Sudarsky - 2016 - Foundations of Physics 46 (7):852-879.
Relativistic State Reduction Dynamics.Daniel J. Bedingham - 2011 - Foundations of Physics 41 (4):686-704.
The Conway-Kochen Argument and Relativistic GRW Models.Angelo Bassi & GianCarlo Ghirardi - 2007 - Foundations of Physics 37 (2):169-185.
Quantum Non-Gravity and Stellar Collapse.C. Barceló, L. J. Garay & G. Jannes - 2011 - Foundations of Physics 41 (9):1532-1541.
The Black Hole Information Paradox and the Collapse of the Wave Function.Elias Okon & Daniel Sudarsky - 2015 - Foundations of Physics 45 (4):461-470.
Time Reversal Symmetry and Collapse Models.D. J. Bedingham & O. J. E. Maroney - 2017 - Foundations of Physics 47 (5):670-696.
Relativistic quantum becoming.Wayne C. Myrvold - 2003 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 54 (3):475-500.
Ontology for Collapse Theories.Wayne C. Myrvold - 2017 - In Shan Gao (ed.), Collapse of the Wave Function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Relativistic Markovian dynamical collapse theories must employ nonstandard degrees of freedom.Wayne C. Myrvold - 2017 - Physical Review A 96:062116.
Less Interpretation and More Decoherence in Quantum Gravity and Inflationary Cosmology.Elise M. Crull - 2015 - Foundations of Physics 45 (9):1019-1045.
Analytics
Added to PP
2018-07-18
Downloads
17 (#641,389)
6 months
1 (#450,993)
2018-07-18
Downloads
17 (#641,389)
6 months
1 (#450,993)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Losing Stuff Down a Black Hole.Elias Okon & Daniel Sudarsky - 2018 - Foundations of Physics 48 (4):411-428.
References found in this work
Unified dynamics for microscopic and macroscopic systems.GianCarlo Ghirardi, Alberto Rimini & Tullio Weber - 1986 - Physical Review D 34 (D):470–491.
Discussion with Einstein on Epistemological Problems in Atomic Physics.Niels Bohr - 1949 - In Paul Arthur Schilpp (ed.), The Library of Living Philosophers, Volume 7. Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist. Open Court. pp. 199--241.
Primitive Ontology in a Nutshell.Valia Allori - 2015 - International Journal of Quantum Foundations 1 (2):107-122.
A Relativistic Version of the Ghirardi–Rimini–Weber Model.Roderich Tumulka - 2006 - Journal of Statistical Physics 125:821-840.
Less Decoherence and More Coherence in Quantum Gravity, Inflationary Cosmology and Elsewhere.Elias Okon & Daniel Sudarsky - 2016 - Foundations of Physics 46 (7):852-879.