Theory and Decision 49 (4):339-360 (2000)
The paper describes a methodology to be used for analysis and design of human activity systems. The methodology is based on an analysis of the decision settings whereas most other decision analysis methodologies are analysing the process. The decision concept is analysed and discussed. A distinction between programmed and programmable as well as non-programmed and non-programmable decisions is proposed. A classification of different information types for decision making is presented. A methodology based on a systemic and systematic analysis of the information requirements of an organization is proposed. This methodology also indicates organizational discrepancies and information imbalances. The methodology focuses the settings of the decisions on all levels of organizations. The methodology can be regarded as a dynamic, learning system. The author proposes further research on the individuals decision making abilities
|Keywords||Human activity systems Decision analysis Decision settings Organizational discrepancies Methodology Systems design Information requirement Non-programmable decisions|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
'How Do I Choose Thee? Let Me Count the Ways': A Textual Analysis of Similarities and Differences in Modes of Decision-Making in China and the United States.Elke U. Weber, Daniel Ames & Ann-Renee Blais - manuscript
Artificial Decision-Making and Artificial Ethics: A Management Concern. [REVIEW]Omar E. M. Khalil - 1993 - Journal of Business Ethics 12 (4):313 - 321.
The Evolution of Group Decision Support Systems to Enable Collaborative Authoring of Outcomes.Patrick Humphreys & Garrick Jones - 2006 - World Futures 62 (3):193 – 222.
The Methodology of Social Judgement Theory.Ray W. Cooksey - 1996 - Thinking and Reasoning 2 (2 & 3):141 – 174.
Cultural and Ethical Effects on Managerial Decisions: Examined in a Throughput Model. [REVIEW]Waymond Rodgers & Susana Gago - 2001 - Journal of Business Ethics 31 (4):355 - 367.
From Analysis/Synthesis to Conjecture/Analysis: A Review of Karl Popper’s Influence on Design Methodology in Architecture. [REVIEW]Greg Bamford - 2002 - Design Studies 23 (3):245-61.
Moral Imagination and Systems Thinking.Patricia H. Werhane - 2002 - Journal of Business Ethics 38 (1-2):33 - 42.
Enterprise Risk Management: Applications of Economic Modeling and Information Technology.Christine P. Ries - 2001 - Mind and Society 2 (2):1-8.
The Implications of Irreversibility in Emergency Response Decisions.Noël Pauwels, Bartel van De Walle, Frank Hardeman & Karel Soudan - 2000 - Theory and Decision 49 (1):25-51.
Man as a Stabiliser of Systems: From Static Snapshots of Judgement Processes to Dynamic Decision Making.Berndt Brehmer - 1996 - Thinking and Reasoning 2 (2 & 3):225 – 238.
By-Person Factor Analysis in Clinical Ethical Decision Making: Q Methodology in End-of-Life Care Decisions.William Wong, Arnold R. Eiser, Robert G. Mrtek & Paul S. Heckerling - 2004 - American Journal of Bioethics 4 (3):W8-W22.
Added to index2010-09-02
Total downloads23 ( #216,531 of 2,158,806 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #132,835 of 2,158,806 )
How can I increase my downloads?