History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 24 (2):219 - 247 (2002)
Although Lorenz Oken is a classic example of Naturphilosophie as applied to biology, his views have been imperfectly understood. He is best viewed as a follower of Schelling who consistently attempted to apply Schelling's ideas to biological data. His version of Naturphilosophie, however, was strongly influenced by older pseudoscience traditions, especially alchemy and numerology as they had been presented by Robert Fludd, whose works were current in Jena and available to him. According to those influences, parts of Oken's philosophical conception were communicable even in a non-idealistic scientific culture, for example in Paris, where Oken met Étienne Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire. Geoffroy however was embedded in a French intellectual tradition, and the correspondence between his views and those of Oken was only superficial. The English anatomist Richard Owen attempted to incorporate the views of Oken and Geoffroy within his own, idiosyncratic system. Although Darwin knew of Oken's ideas, it was Geoffroy who really affected his evolutionary biology, and any influence of Oken must have been attenuated to the point of triviality
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
The Darwinian Revolution as Viewed by a Philosophical Biologist.Michael T. Ghiselin - 2005 - Journal of the History of Biology 38 (1):123-136.
Similar books and articles
Hegel's Development, Night Thoughts (Jena 1801-1806).H. S. Harris - 1983 - Oxford University Press.
Schelling’s Naturphilosophie Project: Towards a Spinozian Conception of Nature.Alex Guilherme - 2010 - South African Journal of Philosophy 29 (3):373-390.
Instinct in the '50s: The British Reception of Konrad Lorenz's Theory of Instinctive Behavior.Paul E. Griffiths - 2004 - Biology and Philosophy 19 (4):609-631.
After Jena: Fichte's Religionslehre.Yolanda Estes - 2008 - In Daniel Breazeale & Tom Rockmore (eds.), After Jena: New Essays on Fichte's Later Philosophy. Northwestern University Press.
Marx's Critique of Hegel's Philosophy of Nature.John L. Stanley - 1997 - Science and Society 61 (4):449 - 473.
The Instinct Concept of the Early Konrad Lorenz.Ingo Brigandt - 2005 - Journal of the History of Biology 38 (3):571–608..
Die Naturphilosophie im 18. Jahrhundert und der naturwissenschaftliche Unterricht in Tübingen. Zu den Quellen von Schellings Naturphilosophie.Manfred Durner - 1991 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 73 (1):71-103.
The Early Theoretical Development of Konrad Lorenz and the Motivating Factors Behind His Instinct Concept [La Prima Fase Dello Sviluppo Teorico di Konrad Lorenz E I Fattori Motivanti Del Suo Concetto di Istinto].Ingo Brigandt - 2005 - In M. Celentano & M. Stanzione (eds.), Konrad Lorenz cent'anni dopo: L'eredità scientifica del padre dell'etologia. pp. 47–69.
Review: Naturphilosophie zwischen Naturwissenschaft und Philosophie. Neue Sammelbände zur Naturphilosophie des deutschen Idealismus. [REVIEW]Paul Ziche - 1996 - Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 50 (3):473 - 491.
Added to index2010-08-10
Total downloads19 ( #255,848 of 2,157,997 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #136,617 of 2,157,997 )
How can I increase my downloads?