The Wrong of Rudeness: Learning Modern Civility From Ancient Chinese Philosophy

New York, NY, United States of America: Oxford University Press (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Being rude is often more gratifying and enjoyable than being polite. Likewise, rudeness can be a more accurate and powerful reflection of how I feel and think. This is especially true in a political environment that can make being polite seem foolish or naive. Civility and ordinary politeness are linked both to big values, such as respect and consideration, and to the fundamentally social nature of human beings. This book explores the powerful temptations to incivility and rudeness, but argues that they should generally be resisted. Drawing on early Chinese philosophers who lived during great political turmoil but nonetheless sought to “mind their manners,” it articulates a way of thinking about politeness that is distinctively social. It takes as a given that we can feel profoundly alienated from others, and that other people can sometimes be truly terrible. Yet because we are social neglecting the social and political courtesies comes at great cost. The book considers not simply why civility and politeness are important, but how. It addresses how small insults can damage social relations, how separation of people into tribes undermines our better interests, and explores how bodily and facial expressions can influence how life with other people goes. It is especially geared toward anyone who feels the temptation of being rude and wishes it were easier to feel otherwise. It seeks to answer a question of great contemporary urgency: When so much of public and social life with others is painful and fractious, why should I be polite?

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,252

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Wrong of Rudeness. [REVIEW]Andrew Lambert - 2020 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2020.
Civility as Self-Determination.Olúfẹḿi O. Táíwò - 2020 - Philosophy East and West 70 (4):1073-1083.
Risks and Temptations: On the Appeal of (In)Civility.Alice MacLachlan - 2020 - Philosophy East and West 70 (4):1109-1120.
Rude Inquiry: Should Philosophy Be More Polite?Alice MacLachlan - 2021 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 31 (2):175-198.
The Philosophy of the Ancient Chinese Mathematician Liu Hui.Xiu Liu - 1998 - Philosophy and Culture 25 (7):652-659.
The Rights and Wrongs of Rudeness.Emrys Westacott - 2006 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 20 (1):1-22.
The renaissance of traditional chinese learning.Shuguang Zhang - 2010 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 5 (2):237-254.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-10-13

Downloads
13 (#984,455)

6 months
7 (#364,455)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Amy Olberding
University of Oklahoma

Citations of this work

The Importance of Forgetting.Rima Basu - 2022 - Episteme 19 (4):471-490.
Chinese ethics.David Wong - 2012 - In Peter Adamson (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Moral Progress for Better Apes.Joshua May - 2023 - Biology and Philosophy 38 (4):1-13.
Disagreement and Free Speech.Sebastien Bishop & Robert Mark Simpson - forthcoming - In Maria Baghramian, Adam Carter & R. Rowland (eds.), Routledge Handbook of Disagreement. Routledge.

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references