Non-written Sources in the Study of the History of Geology: Pros and Cons, in the Light of the Views of Collingwood and Foucault

Annals of Science 56 (4):395-415 (1999)
The paper discusses some of the problems that may be encountered in writing the history of geology with the help of non-written sources, but also offers suggestions as to the kinds of sources that may prove useful. It considers particularly the well-known proposition of R. G. Collingwood that historical writing should involve the attempted 're-enactment of past experience', and also criticisms of such idealist philosophies of history as have been made by Michel Foucault. In considering the relative merits of these two contrasting views, an example is taken from the author's own work, which illustrates the point that attempted 'thought reading', in the manner commended by Collingwood, can sometimes lead to error; thus Foucault's position gains some support. However, it is contended that so much geological knowledge is specific to particular localities that much of the primary literature may be unintelligible without at least some first-hand knowledge of those localities. Thus, an appropriate mix of written and unwritten sources is necessary for writing the history of geology.
Keywords Collingwood   Miscellanea
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/000337999296355
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,827
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
The Vicissitude of Completeness: Gadamer's Criticism of Collingwood.Dimitrios Vardoulakis - 2004 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 12 (1):3 – 19.
Collingwood and Weber Vs. Mink: History After the Cognitive Turn.Stephen Turner - 2011 - Journal of the Philosophy of History 5 (2):230-260.
From Norms to Uses and Back Again.Karim Dharamsi - 2008 - Journal of the Philosophy of History 2 (2):167-184.
Collingwood, Bradley, and Historical Knowledge.Robert M. Burns - 2006 - History and Theory 45 (2):178–203.
Collingwoods Opposition to Biography.Vasso Kindi - 2012 - Journal of the Philosophy of History 6 (1):44-59.
The Idea of History.R. G. Collingwood - 1946 - Oxford University Press.
Added to PP index

Total downloads
11 ( #438,273 of 2,210,098 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #382,810 of 2,210,098 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature