Social Philosophy and Policy 8 (1):121-140 (1990)
Abstract |
By what steps, historically, did morality emerge? Our remote ancestors evolved into social animals. Sociality requires, among other things, restraints on disruptive sexual, hostile, aggressive, vengeful, and acquisitive behavior. Since we are innately social and not social by convention, we can assume the biological evolution of the emotional equipment – numerous predispositions to want, fear, feel anxious or secure – required for social living, just as we can assume cultural evolution of various means to control antisocial behavior and reinforce the prosocial kind. Small clans consisting, say, of several extended families whose members cooperated in hunting, gathering, defense, and child-rearing could not exist without a combination of innate and social restraints on individual behavior. I shall argue for a naturalistic theory of morality, by which I do not mean the definitional claims G.E. Moore sought to refute, but a broader and more complex theory that maintains that a sufficient understanding of human nature, history, and culture can fully explain morality; that nothing is left hanging. A theory that coherently brings together the needed biological, psychological, and cultural facts I shall call a philosophical anthropology; it is a theory that: 1) takes the good for humans – both an ultimate good and other important goods – to depend on human nature; 2) argues that a rudimentary but improving scientific and philosophical theory of human nature now exists, and thus denies that people are “essenceless”; 3) takes this theory to be evolutionary and historical, making the question “How did morality originate?” pivotal for ethical theory, but leaves open the empirical question of the relative importance of biological and cultural evolution; and 4) takes the origin of the moral ideas to be explainable in terms of human nature and history.
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.1017/S0265052500003770 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Beyond Uncertainties: Some Open Questions About Chaos and Ethics.Teresa Kwiatkowska - 2001 - Ethics and the Environment 6 (1):96-115.
Beyond Uncertainties Some Open Questions About Chaos and Ethics.Teresa Kwiatkowska - 2001 - Ethics and the Environment 6 (1):96-115.
Similar books and articles
The Origins of Morality: An Essay in Philosophical Anthropology.Andrew Oldenquist - 1990 - Social Philosophy and Policy 8 (1):121.
Evolutionary Origins of Morality: Cross Disciplinary Perspectives.Leonard Katz (ed.) - 2000 - Imprint Academic.
Beyond Evolution: Human Nature and the Limits of Evolutionary Explanation.Anthony O'Hear - 1997 - Oxford University Press.
The Biological Base of Morality?Paul R. Lawrence - 2004 - The Ruffin Series of the Society for Business Ethics 4:59-79.
Too Strong for Principle: An Examination of the Theory and Philosophical Implications of Evolutionary Ethics.Sam Rayner - unknown
Giner on the Socio-Genesis of Morality. [REVIEW]Sergio Cremaschi - 2013 - Etica E Politica 15 (1):555-562.
Primates and Philosophers: How Morality Evolved.Stephen Macedo & Josiah Ober (eds.) - 2009 - Princeton University Press.
The Biological Base of Morality?Paul R. Lawrence - 2004 - The Ruffin Series of the Society for Business Ethics 2004:59-79.
Puzzling Questions, Not Beyond All Conjecture. BoehmsEvolutionary Origins of Morality'.Robert Knox Dentan - 2000 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 7 (1-2):1-2.
Nomos and Phusis in Democritus and Plato.C. C. W. Taylor - 2007 - Social Philosophy and Policy 24 (2):1-20.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2017-02-17
Total views
48 ( #212,103 of 2,421,643 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #152,248 of 2,421,643 )
2017-02-17
Total views
48 ( #212,103 of 2,421,643 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #152,248 of 2,421,643 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads