Animal Ethics: Toward an Ethics of Responsiveness

Research in Phenomenology 40 (2):267-280 (2010)
Authors
Kelly Oliver
Vanderbilt University
Abstract
The concepts of animal, human, and rights are all part of a philosophical tradition that trades on foreclosing the animal, animality, and animals. Rather than looking to qualities or capacities that make animals the same as or different from humans, I investigate the relationship between the human and the animal. To insist, as animal rights and welfare advocates do, that our ethical obligations to animals are based on their similarities to us reinforces the type of humanism that leads to treating animals—and other people—as subordinates. But, if recent philosophies of difference are any indication, we can acknowledge difference without acknowledging our dependence on animals, or without including animals in ethical considerations. Animal ethics requires rethinking both identity and difference by focusing on relationships and responsivity. My aim is not only to suggest an animal ethics but also to show how ethics itself is transformed by considering animals
Keywords Freud   ethics of difference   Merleau-Ponty   Derrida   Heidegger   animal rights
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2011
DOI 10.1163/156916410X509959
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 37,309
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-08-16

Total views
177 ( #34,496 of 2,309,303 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
13 ( #42,143 of 2,309,303 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature