Trans/Form/Ação 39 (2):53-86 (2016)

Abstract
RESUMO: Os intérpretes dos manuscritos de Leonardo da Vinci partilham dos mesmos sentimentos de espanto e de fascínio quando examinam sua contribuição para a ciência moderna. Podemos, contudo, perceber uma constante tentativa em prol de uma revisão histórica acerca do papel desempenhado por Leonardo. Observando a história dessas revisões, é possível detectar aspectos significativos das perspectivas históricas e historiográficas dos envolvidos nessa discussão. É o que pretendemos fazer neste trabalho, focando a controvérsia entre Duhem, por um lado, e Sarton, Koyré e Rossi, por outro. Ao fazer isso, buscamos discutir alguns traços que marcam a distinção entre uma historiografia mais antiga e a nova historiografia da ciência, tal como exposta por Thomas Kuhn. ABSTRACT: Interpreters of Leonardo da Vinci's manuscripts share the same feelings of astonishment and fascination when they examine his contribution to modern science. However, it is possible to perceive an ongoing attempt towards a historical revision of the role played by Leonardo. Observing the history of this ongoing revision, it is possible to detect significant aspects of the historical and historiographical perspectives of those involved in this discussion. This article deals with the controversy between Duhem's point of view, on the one hand, and the views of Sarton, Koyré, and Rossi on the other. It aims to show some features that distinguish an older historiography from the new historiography of science as presented by Thomas Kuhn.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1590/S0101-31732016000200004
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 61,064
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Duhem’s Legacy for the Change in the Historiography of Science: An Analysis Based on Kuhn’s Writings.Oliveira Amélia - 2017 - Transversal: International Journal for the Historiography of Science 2:127.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Leonardo, Optics and Ophthalmology.Dominique Raynaud - 2013 - In F. Fiorani & A. Nova (eds.), Leonardo da Vinci and Optics. Marsilio. pp. 255-276.
Leonardo Da Vinci's Philosophy of Culture and Esthetics.K. M. Dolgov - 1981 - Russian Studies in Philosophy 20 (2):51-70.
La Historiografía de Koyré y el Problema de la Creatividad Científica.Sergio Menna - 2004 - Cadernos de História E Filosofia da Ciência 14 (1).

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-06-30

Total views
53 ( #196,330 of 2,439,685 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #209,095 of 2,439,685 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes