David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Analysis 54 (4):215 - 223 (1994)
The fundamental thesis of David Lewis's "Parts of Classes" is that the nonempty subsets of a set are mereological parts of it. This paper shows that Lewis's considerations in favor of this thesis are unpersuasive. First, common speech provides no support. Second, the formal analogy between mereology and the Boolean algebra of sets can be explained without accepting the thesis. Third, it is very doubtful that the thesis is fruitful. Certainly, Lewis's claim that it helps us understand set theory is unwarranted
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
David Lewis (1993). Mathematics is Megethology. Philosophia Mathematica 1 (1):3-23.
Neil Tennant (2013). Parts, Classes and Parts of Classes : An Anti-Realist Reading of Lewisian Mereology. Synthese 190 (4):709-742.
David Lewis (1991). Parts of Classes. Blackwell.
Philip Hugly & Charles Sayward (1980). Tarski and Proper Classes. Analysis 40 (4):6-11.
Jose A. Benardete (1992). Parts of Classes. Review of Metaphysics 45 (3):620-622.
Peter Forrest (1991). Book Review: David Lewis. Parts of Classes. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 32 (3):494-497.
John L. Bell (2000). Sets and Classes as Many. Journal of Philosophical Logic 29 (6):585-601.
Gabriel Uzquiano (2003). Plural Quantification and Classes. Philosophia Mathematica 11 (1):67-81.
David-Hillel Ruben (1999). Actions and Their Parts. In The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy. pp. 73-80.
Lowell Friesen (2006). Natural Classes of Universals: Why Armstrong's Analysis Fails. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 84 (2):285 – 296.
Added to index2011-05-29
Total downloads93 ( #51,311 of 1,925,582 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #140,581 of 1,925,582 )
How can I increase my downloads?