In recent years, a revisionist process focused on logical positivism can be observed. One aspect of this revisionism -defended by authors like Michael Friedman, John Earman and George Reisch - is the thesis that Carnap’s later thought is compatible with that of Kuhn and even that Carnap anticipates some relevant points of Kuhn’s theory of science. In this paper I discuss one of Carnap’s texts most frequently cited by revisionists in favor of their thesis -"Truth and Confirmation" - trying to put it in the context of Carnap’s work. My intention is to analyze revisionist interpretation on the basis of other texts by Carnap and show that revisionists, while assembling their jigsaw puzzle concerning Carnap’s work, have inadvertently forgotten to consider some pieces of importance in the formation of a theoretically and historically cogent picture.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Carnap and Kuhn on Linguistic Frameworks and Scientific Revolutions.Gilson Olegario da Silva - 2013 - Manuscrito 36 (1):139-190.
Similar books and articles
Empirical Equivalence in the Quine-Carnap Debate.Eric J. Loomis - 2006 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 87 (4):499–508.
Logical Foundations of Evidential Support.Branden Fitelson - 2006 - Philosophy of Science 73 (5):500-512.
Carnap, Kuhn, and Revisionism (II): On "Structure" and the Philosophical Change.J. C. Pinto de Oliveira - unknown
Carnap, Kuhn, and Revisionism: On the Publication of Structure in Encyclopedia.J. C. P. Oliveira - 2007 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 38 (1):147-157.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads12 ( #373,113 of 2,158,472 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #354,589 of 2,158,472 )
How can I increase my downloads?