- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Holography Does Not Account for Goodness: A Critique of van der Helm and Leeuwenberg (1996)
Psychological Review 111 (1):242-260 (2004)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Holographic Goodness Is Not That Bad: Reply to Olivers, Chater, and Watson (2004).Peter A. van der Helm & Emanuel L. J. Leeuwenberg - 2004 - Psychological Review 111 (1):261-273.
Toward a better approach to goodness: Comments on Van der Helm and Leeuwenberg (1996).Johan Wagemans - 1999 - Psychological Review 106 (3):610-621.
A better approach to goodness: Reply to Wagemans (1999).Peter A. van der Helm & Emanuel L. J. Leeuwenberg - 1999 - Psychological Review 106 (3):622-630.
Goodness of visual regularities: A nontransformational approach.Peter A. van der Helm & Emanuel L. J. Leeuwenberg - 1996 - Psychological Review 103 (3):429-456.
On Not Confusing Necessity with Compulsion: A Reply to Paul Helm.Vincent Brümmer - 1995 - Religious Studies 31 (1):105-109.
On Not Confusing Necessity with Compulsion: a Reply to Paul Helm: VINCENT BRÜMMER.Vincent Brümmer - 1995 - Religious Studies 31 (1):105-109.
G. E. Moore on goodness and reasons.Jonas Olson - 2006 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 84 (4):525 – 534.
Hermeneutics, Holography, and Indian Idealism: A Study of Projection and Gauḍapāda's Māṇḍūkya Kārikā.Stephen Kaplan - 1987 - Motilal Banarsidass.
Functional holography of complex networks activity—from cultures to the human brain.Itay Baruchi, Vernon L. Towle & Eshel Ben-Jacob - 2005 - Complexity 10 (3):38-51.
Optical holography as an analogue for a neural reuse mechanism.Ann Speed, Stephen J. Verzi, John S. Wagner & Christina Warrender - 2010 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33 (4):291-292.
Have Elephant Seals Refuted Aristotle? Nature, Function, and Moral Goodness.Micah Lott - 2012 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 9 (3):353-375.
Augustine’s Christian–Platonist Account of Goodness: A Reconsideration.F. B. A. Asiedu - 2002 - Heythrop Journal 43 (3):328–343.
Analytics
Added to PP
2016-06-30
Downloads
5 (#1,179,345)
6 months
2 (#326,291)
2016-06-30
Downloads
5 (#1,179,345)
6 months
2 (#326,291)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Holographic Goodness Is Not That Bad: Reply to Olivers, Chater, and Watson (2004).Peter A. van der Helm & Emanuel L. J. Leeuwenberg - 2004 - Psychological Review 111 (1):261-273.
References found in this work
Some informational aspects of visual perception.Fred Attneave - 1954 - Psychological Review 61 (3):183-193.
Coding theory of the perception of motion configurations.Frank Restle - 1979 - Psychological Review 86 (1):1-24.
Reconciling simplicity and likelihood principles in perceptual organization.Nick Chater - 1996 - Psychological Review 103 (3):566-581.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-5c86f9596c-qsn25 N