Abstract
From the first months of life, human infants produce “protophones,” speech-like, non-cry sounds, presumed absent, or only minimally present in other apes. But there have been no direct quantitative comparisons to support this presumption. In addition, by 2 months, human infants show sustained face-to-face interaction using protophones, a pattern thought also absent or very limited in other apes, but again, without quantitative comparison. Such comparison should provide evidence relevant to determining foundations of language, since substantially flexible vocalization, the inclination to explore vocalization, and the ability to interact socially by means of vocalization are foundations for language. Here we quantitatively compare data on vocalization rates in three captive bonobo (Pan paniscus) mother–infant pairs with various sources of data from our laboratories on human infant vocalization. Both humans and bonobos produced distress sounds (cries/screams) and laughter. The bonobo infants also produced sounds that were neither screams nor laughs and that showed acoustic similarities to the human protophones. These protophone-like sounds confirm that bonobo infants share with humans the capacity to produce vocalizations that appear foundational for language. Still, there were dramatic differences between the species in both quantity and function of the protophone and protophone-like sounds. The bonobo protophone-like sounds were far less frequent than the human protophones, and the human protophones were far less likely to be interpreted as complaints and more likely as vocal play. Moreover, we found extensive vocal interaction between human infants and mothers, but no vocal interaction in the bonobo mother–infant pairs—while bonobo mothers were physically responsive to their infants, we observed no case of a bonobo mother vocalization directed to her infant. Our cross-species comparison focuses on low- and moderate-arousal circumstances because we reason the roots of language entail vocalization not triggered by excitement, for example, during fighting or intense play. Language appears to be founded in flexible vocalization, used to regulate comfortable social interaction, to share variable affective states at various levels of arousal, and to explore vocalization itself.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00729
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,979
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Language Evolution: Consensus and Controversies.Morten H. Christiansen & Simon Kirby - 2003 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7 (7):300-307.

View all 11 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Evolution of Human Vocal Emotion.Gregory A. Bryant - 2020 - Emotion Review 13 (1):25-33.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Trickle-Up Phonetics: A Vocal Role for the Infant.John L. Locke - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (4):516-516.
The Hand Leads the Mouth in Ontogenesis Too.Jana M. Iverson & Esther Thelen - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (2):225-226.
Editorial: Unnatural Behaviour.[author unknown] - 1999 - Philosophy 74 (4):471-471.
Vocal Innovation.John L. Locke - 2007 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (4):415-416.
Parental Selection of Vocal Behavior.John L. Locke - 2006 - Human Nature 17 (2):155-168.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-12-22

Total views
6 ( #1,132,778 of 2,505,145 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #209,577 of 2,505,145 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes