Biology and Philosophy 6 (1):81-92 (1991)
This paper considers a variety of attempts to define fitness in such a way as to defend the theory of evolution by natural selection from the criticism that it is a circular argument. Each of the definitions is shown to be inconsistent with the others. The paper argues that the environment in which an animal evolves can be defined only with respect to the properties of the phenotype of the animal and that it is therefore not illuminating to try to explain the phenotypic properties of the animal in terms of adaptation to an environment that is defined by those very properties. Furthermore, since there is no way that the environment can be defined independently of the presence of the animal there is no way that the quality of an animal can be assessed; and there can be no objective criteria by whichany form of selection can be carried out, therefore there can be no criteria by whichnatural selection can be carried out. It is proposed that fitness is nothing more than the production of offspring, that this is a phenotypic property like all the others, and if it is heritable then the offspring of the parents that produce the most offspring will themselves produce the most offspring, and that in principle it is impossible to account for this in terms of the other phenotypic properties of the fittest animals except by circular argument. Differential rates of reproduction are the causes of evolution and the phenotypic causes are strictly inexplicable.
|Keywords||Evolution fitness natural selection|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Sociobiology and the Preemption of Social Science.Alexander Rosenberg - 1980 - Johns Hopkins University Press, C1980.
The Propensity Interpretation of Fitness.Susan K. Mills & John H. Beatty - 1979 - Philosophy of Science 46 (2):263-286.
Darwinism Defended: A Guide to the Evolution Controversies.Michael Ruse - 1983 - Journal of the History of Biology 16 (3):441-442.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Fitness “Kinematics”: Biological Function, Altruism, and Organism–Environment Development.Marshall Abrams - 2009 - Biology and Philosophy 24 (4):487-504.
The Non-Existence of a Principle of Natural Selection.Abner Shimony - 1989 - Biology and Philosophy 4 (3):255-273.
Investigating the Emergence of Phenotypic Plasticity in Evolving Digital Organisms.Robert Pennock - manuscript
The Confusions of Fitness.André Ariew & R. C. Lewontin - 2004 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55 (2):347-363.
Formalization of the Basic Concepts of Animal Ecology.B. S. Niven - 1982 - Erkenntnis 17 (3):307 - 320.
Evolution, Phenotypic Selection, and the Units of Selection.Timothy Shanahan - 1990 - Philosophy of Science 57 (2):210-225.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads12 ( #380,645 of 2,177,875 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #317,247 of 2,177,875 )
How can I increase my downloads?